These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34634672)

  • 1. Novel side by side Foley catheter balloons for 'extended labour induction': Concept, simulation study and clinical application.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Dalmacio R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Nov; 266():133-137. PubMed ID: 34634672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended balloon labour induction: A single arm proof of concept trial.
    Matshitsa L; Mercy-Nkuba N; Hofmeyr GJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X; 2023 Sep; 19():100226. PubMed ID: 37649714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae.
    Sayed Ahmed WA; Ibrahim ZM; Ashor OE; Mohamed ML; Ahmed MR; Elshahat AM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1489-1494. PubMed ID: 27436681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
    Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does cervical ripening at term using a high volume foley catheter result in a lower caesarean section rate than a low volume foley catheter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Berndl A; El-Chaar D; Murphy K; McDonald S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Aug; 36(8):678-687. PubMed ID: 25222162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Foley catheter for induction of labour filled with 30mL or 60mL: A randomized controlled trial.
    Sandberg EM; Schepers EM; Sitter RLV; Huisman CMA; Wijngaarden WJV
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Apr; 211():150-155. PubMed ID: 28260689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications associated with the use of the transcervical balloon catheter in induction of labour: A systematic review.
    Gommers JSM; Diederen M; Wilkinson C; Turnbull D; Mol BWJ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Nov; 218():73-84. PubMed ID: 28963922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
    Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
    BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.
    Cheuk QK; Lo TK; Lee CP; Yeung AP
    Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Jun; 21(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 25999032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study.
    Solt I; Frank Wolf M; Ben-Haroush S; Kaminskyi S; Ophir E; Bornstein J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(7):1034-1041. PubMed ID: 31185762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter.
    Levy R; Ferber A; Ben-Arie A; Paz B; Hazan Y; Blickstein I; Hagay ZJ
    BJOG; 2002 Feb; 109(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 11888099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised controlled trial comparing 30 mL and 80 mL in Foley catheter for induction of labour after previous Caesarean section.
    Manish P; Rathore S; Benjamin SJ; Abraham A; Jeyaseelan V; Mathews JE
    Trop Doct; 2016 Oct; 46(4):205-211. PubMed ID: 26774112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Blown out of proportion? Induction Foley balloon ruptures associated with overinflation.
    Schoen CN; Keefe KW; Berghella V; Sciscione A; Pettker CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2019 Aug; 1(3):100026. PubMed ID: 33345790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Gu N; Ru T; Wang Z; Dai Y; Zheng M; Xu B; Hu Y
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136856. PubMed ID: 26322635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Misoprostol vaginal insert and Foley catheter in labour induction - single center retrospective observational study of obstetrical outcome.
    Mlodawski J; Mlodawska M; Plusajska J; Galuszewska J; Glijer K; Gluszek S
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(11):700-703. PubMed ID: 33301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Marti Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Campillos Maza JM; Castán Mateo S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 28315935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.