These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34634982)

  • 81. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
    Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Supreme Court of India judgement on abortion as a fundamental right: breaking new ground.
    Jain D
    Sex Reprod Health Matters; 2023 Dec; 31(1):2225264. PubMed ID: 37395544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. The US Supreme Court abortion verdict is a tragedy. This is how research organizations can help.
    Nature; 2022 Jun; 606(7916):839-840. PubMed ID: 35764803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Renee B. v. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.
    Florida. Supreme Court
    Wests South Report; 2001; 790():1036-42. PubMed ID: 16479688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. What the U.S. Constitution says. The law and abortion.
    Liben P
    Freedom Rev; 1995; 26(5):20-1. PubMed ID: 12346849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Supreme Court upholds abortion rights. Decision underscores "partial-birth" ruse.
    Farmer A
    Reprod Freedom News; 2000; 9(7):1, 4. PubMed ID: 12322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. US Supreme Court upholds abortion rights, for now.
    Jaffe S
    Lancet; 2020 Jul; 396(10244):85-86. PubMed ID: 32653060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. When children have children: the teen pregnancy predicament.
    Carter DM; Felice ME; Rosoff J; Zabin LS; Beilenson PL; Dannenberg AL
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 8037929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Abortion and birth control--right to abortion and regulation thereof: the United States Supreme Court invalidates a statute banning partial birth abortions: Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
    Joersz M
    N D Law Rev; 2001; 77(2):345-73. PubMed ID: 12956123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology.
    Yousif J; Adlam T; Grant-Kels JM; Farshchian M
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 87(5):1225-1226. PubMed ID: 35868572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The End of
    Ziegler M
    Am J Bioeth; 2022 Aug; 22(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 35593911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Supreme Court Strikes Down Abortion Regulations; Texas Bill Found Unconstitutional.
    Kraus M
    Am J Law Med; 2016 Nov; 42(4):859-861. PubMed ID: 29086652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Dobbs vs. Jackson Supreme Court ruling: a stimulant of male reproductive responsibility.
    Dietrich PN; Sandlow JI
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jul; 120(1):198. PubMed ID: 37121569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Abortion: Supreme Court avoids disturbing abortion precedents by ruling on grounds of Remedy-Ayotte v. planned parenthood of Northern New England.
    Law N
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(2):469-71. PubMed ID: 16789971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Supreme Court rejects another anti-choice appeal in racketeering suit.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1994 Dec; 3(22):2. PubMed ID: 12345799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Gender Backlash and the Moderating Role of Shared Racial Group Membership.
    Xiao VL; Lowery BS; Stillwell A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Apr; 49(4):554-570. PubMed ID: 35184631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Hope Clinic v. Ryan.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 2001; 249():603-6. PubMed ID: 16482667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Attitudes of senior nursing students toward the 1973 Supreme Court decision on abortion.
    Elder RG
    JOGN Nurs; 1975; 4(4):46-54. PubMed ID: 1040707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.