These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34635008)

  • 21. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.
    Maxwell NP; Cates EE; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):1023-1044. PubMed ID: 37926731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory.
    Kimball DR; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):918-29. PubMed ID: 14651299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory.
    Zhao W; Li J; Shanks DR; Li B; Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):557-574. PubMed ID: 36848046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the effect of list composition on monitoring and control processes in metamemory.
    Laursen SJ; Fiacconi CM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):498-517. PubMed ID: 33057906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Beliefs about memory decline in aging do not impact judgments of learning (JOLs): A challenge for belief-based explanations of JOLs.
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Aug; 47(6):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 30859406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests.
    Li B; Zhao W; Zheng J; Hu X; Su N; Fan T; Yin Y; Liu M; Yang C; Luo L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):1061-1077. PubMed ID: 34855150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.
    Double KS; Birney DP; Walker SA
    Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):741-750. PubMed ID: 29161973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory.
    Agadzhanyan K; Castel AD
    Memory; 2024 Feb; 32(2):252-263. PubMed ID: 38289343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The concreteness effect on judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of fluency and beliefs.
    Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):639-650. PubMed ID: 27987115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
    Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.
    Peynircioğlu ZF; Tatz JR
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):412-419. PubMed ID: 30411221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The font size effect depends on inter-item relation.
    Chang M; Brainerd CJ
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1702-1713. PubMed ID: 36995573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
    Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. On belief and fluency in the construction of judgments of learning: Assessing and altering the direct effects of belief.
    Blake AB; Castel AD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():27-38. PubMed ID: 29689481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An ERP study on metacognitive monitoring processes in children.
    Tsalas NRH; Müller BCN; Meinhardt J; Proust J; Paulus M; Sodian B
    Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 1695():84-90. PubMed ID: 29852136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
    Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.
    Li X; Chen G; Yang C
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):912-922. PubMed ID: 33675000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.