These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34636081)

  • 61. Consonant closed likelihood ratio test procedures with application to dose-response study.
    Wang B; Cui X
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(25):2617-30. PubMed ID: 20740552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Graphical approaches for the control of generalized error rates.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(23):3135-3155. PubMed ID: 32557848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. On adaptive error spending approach for group sequential trials with random information levels.
    Liu Q; Lim P; Nuamah I; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):687-99. PubMed ID: 22651109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Testing each hypothesis marginally at alpha while still controlling FWER: how and when.
    Li JD
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1730-8. PubMed ID: 22806832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests.
    Strassburger K; Bretz F
    Stat Med; 2008 Oct; 27(24):4914-27. PubMed ID: 18618415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Online control of the familywise error rate.
    Tian J; Ramdas A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Apr; 30(4):976-993. PubMed ID: 33413033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
    Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Minimally adaptive BH: A tiny but uniform improvement of the procedure of Benjamini and Hochberg.
    Solari A; Goeman JJ
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):776-780. PubMed ID: 27192178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Simulation study comparing exposure matching with regression adjustment in an observational safety setting with group sequential monitoring.
    Stratton KG; Cook AJ; Jackson LA; Nelson JC
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1117-33. PubMed ID: 25510526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. An extended sequential goodness-of-fit multiple testing method for discrete data.
    Castro-Conde I; Döhler S; de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2356-2375. PubMed ID: 26265767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. An improved closed procedure for testing multiple hypotheses.
    Lu ZH
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(26):3772-3786. PubMed ID: 32706424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Group sequential monitoring of distribution-free analyses of repeated measures.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 1997 Mar; 16(6):653-68. PubMed ID: 9131754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Methods to adjust for multiple comparisons in the analysis and sample size calculation of randomised controlled trials with multiple primary outcomes.
    Vickerstaff V; Omar RZ; Ambler G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):129. PubMed ID: 31226934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Reducing overestimation of the treatment effect by interim analysis when designing clinical trials.
    Shimura M
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2019 Apr; 44(2):243-248. PubMed ID: 30414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Online error rate control for platform trials.
    Robertson DS; Wason JMS; König F; Posch M; Jaki T
    Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(14):2475-2495. PubMed ID: 37005003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Computations for group sequential boundaries using the Lan-DeMets spending function method.
    Reboussin DM; DeMets DL; Kim KM; Lan KK
    Control Clin Trials; 2000 Jun; 21(3):190-207. PubMed ID: 10822118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Advances in p-Value Based Multiple Test Procedures.
    Tamhane AC; Gou J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 29072552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Modified FDR controlling procedure for multi-stage analyses.
    Tuglus C; van der Laan MJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8(1):Article 12. PubMed ID: 19222379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A group sequential test for treatment effect based on the Fine-Gray model.
    Martens MJ; Logan BR
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):1006-1013. PubMed ID: 29534294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.