These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34636587)

  • 1. Individual differences in three aspects of evaluation: The motives to have, learn, and express attitudes.
    Xu M; Petty RE; Wright N; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Aug; 121(2):257-284. PubMed ID: 34636587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Differences in Attitude Consistency Over Time: The Personal Attitude Stability Scale.
    Xu M; Briñol P; Gretton JD; Tormala ZL; Rucker DD; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1507-1519. PubMed ID: 32146864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lay theories of financial well-being predict political and policy message preferences.
    Krijnen JMT; Ülkümen G; Bogard JE; Fox CR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Feb; 122(2):310-336. PubMed ID: 35130024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Documenting individual differences in the propensity to hold attitudes with certainty.
    DeMarree KG; Petty RE; Briñol P; Xia J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Dec; 119(6):1239-1265. PubMed ID: 32584098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Need to evaluate: an assessment proposal in Spanish].
    Horcajo J; Díaz D; Briñol P; Gandarillas B
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):557-62. PubMed ID: 19014716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle.
    Feinberg M; Wehling E; Chung JM; Saslow LR; Melvær Paulin I
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Apr; 118(4):777-804. PubMed ID: 31246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognizing and Trusting Persuasion Agents: Attitudes Bias Trustworthiness Judgments, but not Persuasion Detection.
    Grillo TLH; Pizzutti C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 May; 47(5):796-809. PubMed ID: 32772871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in preference for epistemic versus teleologic strategies of deliberate self-persuasion.
    Taylor CA; Lord CG; Morin AL; Brady SE; Yoke K; Lu T
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Mar; 26(1):177-94. PubMed ID: 24274048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring the transformative utopian impulse for planetary health in the age of the Anthropocene: a multi-study scale development and validation.
    Basso F; Krpan D
    Lancet Planet Health; 2022 Mar; 6(3):e230-e242. PubMed ID: 35278389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual attitude change and societal dynamics: Computational experiments with psychological theories.
    Lorenz J; Neumann M; Schröder T
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jul; 128(4):623-642. PubMed ID: 34060889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology": Correction.
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):164. PubMed ID: 29658728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN IDENTITY AND ACADEMIC MOTIVATION.
    Matsushima R; Ozaki H
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Aug; 117(1):217-29. PubMed ID: 26302294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A machine learning model of cultural change: Role of prosociality, political attitudes, and Protestant work ethic.
    Sheetal A; Savani K
    Am Psychol; 2021 Sep; 76(6):997-1012. PubMed ID: 34914435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.
    Wood W
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2000; 51():539-70. PubMed ID: 10751980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the effect of regulatory focus on ad attitudes: the moderating roles of message sidedness and argument quality.
    Kao DT
    Int J Psychol; 2012; 47(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 22150336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How Can Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Both Be Changed? Testing Two Interventions to Promote Consumption of Green Vegetables.
    Mattavelli S; Avishai A; Perugini M; Richetin J; Sheeran P
    Ann Behav Med; 2017 Aug; 51(4):511-518. PubMed ID: 28124183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do people realize how their partners make them feel? Relationship enhancement motives and stress determine the link between implicitly assessed partner attitudes and relationship satisfaction.
    Hicks LL; McNulty JK; Faure R; Meltzer AL; Righetti F; Hofmann W
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):335-369. PubMed ID: 32718166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.
    Day MV; Fiske ST; Downing EL; Trail TE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1559-73. PubMed ID: 25286912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age differences in attitude change: influences of cognitive resources and motivation on responses to argument quantity.
    Wang M; Chen Y
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 16953719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.