195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34636927)
1. Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Singamsetty R; Rout SK; Giri SK; Panda R; Behera KK; Sable MN
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 34636927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Glandular Liposculpture as a Single Treatment for Grades I and II Gynaecomastia.
Abdelrahman I; Steinvall I; Mossaad B; Sjoberg F; Elmasry M
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(5):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 29549405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective Analysis and Comparison of Periareolar Excision (Delivery) Technique and Pull-Through Technique for the Treatment of Gynecomastia.
Tripathy S; Likhyani A; Sharma R; Sharma RK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Jun; 44(3):653-661. PubMed ID: 31989232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: Subcutaneous Mastectomy and Liposuction.
Kim DH; Byun IH; Lee WJ; Rah DK; Kim JY; Lee DW
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 40(6):877-884. PubMed ID: 27679453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Liposuction Assisted Gynecomastia Surgery With Minimal Periareolar Incision: a Systematic Review.
Prasetyono TOH; Budhipramono AG; Andromeda I
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Feb; 46(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 34379157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study : Re: Cross chest Vs conventional Liposuction in Gynecomastia.
Rout SK
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(Suppl 1):57-58. PubMed ID: 34845519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. No-Drain Single Incision Liposuction Pull-Through Technique for Gynecomastia.
Khalil AA; Ibrahim A; Afifi AM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Apr; 41(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 28032170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postero-Inferior Pedicle Surgical Technique for the Treatment of Grade III Gynecomastia.
Thiénot S; Bertheuil N; Carloni R; Méal C; Aillet S; Herlin C; Watier E
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(3):531-541. PubMed ID: 28204931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endoscopic Axillary Approach Improves Patient Satisfaction of Gynecomastia Subcutaneous Mastectomy: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the BODY-Q Chest Module.
Xu B; Mu D; Yang Y; Liu T
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(6):2011-2020. PubMed ID: 31555872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expected Reduction of The Nipple-Areolar Complex Over Time After Treatment of Gynecomastia with Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Mastectomy Compared to Subcutaneous Mastectomy Alone.
Pfeiler PP; Luketina R; Dastagir K; Vogt PM; Mett TR; Kaltenborn A; Könneker S
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(2):431-437. PubMed ID: 33108501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical correction of gynecomastia with minimal scarring.
Lee JH; Kim IK; Kim TG; Kim YH
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1302-6. PubMed ID: 22955861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Innocenti A; Melita D
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):2060-2061. PubMed ID: 34845515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Invited Discussion on: "Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: a Prospective Comparative Study".
Zocchi ML; Vindigni V
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Jun; 46(3):1071-1074. PubMed ID: 34799764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Letter to the Editor: Aesthetic Outcome of Gynecomastia Management with Conventional Liposuction and Cross-Chest Liposuction: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Atiyeh BS; Chahine F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Apr; 46(Suppl 1):54-56. PubMed ID: 34761288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Gynecomastia: Ultrasound-Confirmed Classification Pertainent to Surgical Correction.
Klinger M; Bandi V; Giannasi S; Caviggioli F; Veronesi A; Maione L; Catania B; Lisa A; Battistini A; Tinterri C; Testori A; Vinci V; Klinger F
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 33625529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Defining the Inframammary Fold by Liposuction: An Essential Tool in Aesthetic Shaping of the Reconstructed Breast. Technique and Long-term Results in a Series of Patients.
Pinto V; Pignatti M; Contu L; Cipriani R
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Feb; 46(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 34467422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical Masculinization of the Breast: Clinical Classification and Surgical Procedures.
Cardenas-Camarena L; Dorado C; Guerrero MT; Nava R
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(3):507-516. PubMed ID: 28341946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Complications and Outcomes After Gynecomastia Surgery: Analysis of 204 Pediatric and 1583 Adult Cases from a National Multi-center Database.
Zavlin D; Jubbal KT; Friedman JD; Echo A
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Aug; 41(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 28341949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gynecomastia: glandular-liposculpture through a single transaxillary one hole incision.
Lee YK; Lee JH; Kang SY
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Apr; 52(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28758536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reoperation Because of Dissatisfaction with the Aesthetic Results of Gynecomastia Surgery: Technical Considerations.
Lee SR; Lee SG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 33527188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
