These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3463718)

  • 1. Creep versus marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Vrijhoef MM; Letzel H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 3463718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical performance and physical properties of twelve amalgam alloys.
    Osborne JW; Gale EN; Chew CL; Rhodes BF; Phillips RW
    J Dent Res; 1978; 57(11-12):983-8. PubMed ID: 281345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials.
    Letzel H; van 't Hof MA; Marshall GW; Marshall SJ
    J Dent Res; 1997 Nov; 76(11):1787-98. PubMed ID: 9372797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Copper-rich and conventional amalgam restorations after clinical use.
    Marshall GW; Jackson BL; Marshall SJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1980 Jan; 100(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 6927885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical performance of a gold-containing amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Marantz R; Adey JD
    J Dent Res; 1979 Nov; 58(11):2109-15. PubMed ID: 292678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between creep, gamma 2, and marginal fracture of dental amalgams.
    Sarkar NK; Eyer CS; Norling BK
    J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Nov; 10(6):489-94. PubMed ID: 6580405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of marginal fracture of amalgam restorations: one-year report.
    Osborne JW; Friedman SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Mar; 55(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 3457164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of high copper amalgam restorations.
    Rydinge E; Goldberg J; Sanchez L; Lambert K; Munster E
    J Oral Rehabil; 1981 Nov; 8(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 7031204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of moisture contamination on high-copper amalgam.
    Yamada T; Fusayama T
    J Dent Res; 1981 Mar; 60(3):716-23. PubMed ID: 6937502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creep and rupture of dental amalgam under bending stress.
    Ogura H; Miyagawa Y; Nakamura K
    Dent Mater J; 1989 Jun; 8(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 2638962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of three amalgam alloys.
    Tyas MJ; Ewers GJ
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Jun; 38(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 8373297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The finishing and early marginal fracture of clinical amalgam restorations.
    Bryant RW; Collins CJ
    J Dent; 1989 Jun; 17(3):111-6. PubMed ID: 2768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Margin adaptation of dispersion and traditional amalgams with reference to plasticity: a clinical comparison.
    Matsson L; Ryge G; Weidemanis C; Granath L
    J Dent Res; 1982 Oct; 61(10):1172-5. PubMed ID: 6749925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High copper alloys for dental amalgam.
    Beech DR
    Int Dent J; 1982 Sep; 32(3):240-51. PubMed ID: 6958652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of a lathe-cut high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Knibbs PJ; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Jones PA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 3312541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of polishing on the marginal integrity of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 6585528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Creep-fatigue as a possible cause of dental amalgam margin failure.
    Williams PT; Hedge GL
    J Dent Res; 1985 Mar; 64(3):470-5. PubMed ID: 3855901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.