179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34637890)
1. The diagnostic efficacy of quantitative light-induced fluorescence in detection of dental caries of primary teeth.
Cho KH; Kang CM; Jung HI; Lee HS; Lee K; Lee TY; Song JS
J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103845. PubMed ID: 34637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new screening method to detect proximal dental caries using fluorescence imaging.
Kim ES; Lee ES; Kang SM; Jung EH; de Josselin de Jong E; Jung HI; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2017 Dec; 20():257-262. PubMed ID: 29079349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of fluorescence parameters between three generations of QLF devices for detecting enamel caries in vitro and on smooth surfaces.
Park SW; Kim SK; Lee HS; Lee ES; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2019 Mar; 25():142-147. PubMed ID: 30508664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a fluorescence-image scoring system for assessing noncavitated occlusal caries.
Jung EH; Lee ES; Jung HI; Kang SM; de Josselin de Jong E; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2018 Mar; 21():36-42. PubMed ID: 29102651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of Dental Caries and Cracks with Quantitative Light-Induced Fluorescence in Comparison to Radiographic and Visual Examination: A Retrospective Case Study.
Oh SH; Lee SR; Choi JY; Choi YS; Kim SH; Yoon HC; Nelson G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Mar; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33802443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the detection of approximal caries in vitro.
Ko HY; Kang SM; Kim HE; Kwon HK; Kim BI
J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):568-75. PubMed ID: 25724115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of initial caries lesions on smooth surfaces by quantitative light-induced fluorescence and visual examination: an in vivo comparison.
Heinrich-Weltzien R; Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Angmar-Månsson B; Stösser L
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):494-8. PubMed ID: 16324139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo detection of non-cavitated caries lesions on occlusal surfaces by visual inspection and quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Hickel R; Stösser L; Heinrich-Weltzien R
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Jun; 65(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 17514522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical performance of fluorescence-based methods for detection of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Pontes LRA; Novaes TF; Moro BLP; Braga MM; Mendes FM
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e91. PubMed ID: 29116301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of dental caries detection with quantitative light-induced fluorescence in comparison to different field of view devices.
Oh SH; Choi JY; Kim SH
Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6139. PubMed ID: 35414687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tooth caries classification with quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) images using convolutional neural network for permanent teeth in vivo.
Park EY; Jeong S; Kang S; Cho J; Cho JY; Kim EK
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Dec; 23(1):981. PubMed ID: 38066624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study to quantify demineralized enamel in deciduous and permanent teeth using laser- and light-induced fluorescence techniques.
Ando M; van Der Veen MH; Schemehorn BR; Stookey GK
Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 11799288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of in vitro demineralization of primary teeth using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF).
Pretty IA; Edgar WM; Higham SM
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 12028307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monitoring enamel caries on resin-treated occlusal surfaces using quantitative light-induced fluorescence: an in vitro study.
Silva FG; Freitas PM; Mendes FM; de Novaes TF; Diniz MB; Oliveira Guaré R
Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 32382936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of surface defects in early caries assessment using quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and micro-digital-photography (MDP).
Meharry MR; Dawson D; Wefel JS; Harless JD; Kummet CM; Xiao X
J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):955-61. PubMed ID: 22892465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro performance of QLF system and conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries around tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
Lenzi TL; Piovesan C; Mendes FM; Braga MM; Raggio DP
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Jan; 26(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25604208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of non-cavitated root caries lesions by quantitative light-induced fluorescence-An in vivo feasibility study.
Günther E; Park KJ; Meißner T; Kottmann T; Schmalz G; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2020 Jun; 30():101671. PubMed ID: 31988025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing caries removal by undergraduate dental students using quantitative light-induced fluorescence.
Adeyemi AA; Jarad FD; Komarov GN; Pender N; Higham SM
J Dent Educ; 2008 Nov; 72(11):1318-23. PubMed ID: 18981210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of resin infiltration using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Min JH; Inaba D; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2016 Sep; 15():6-10. PubMed ID: 27174211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of quantitative light-induced fluorescence to assess lesion depth in cavitated and non-cavitated root caries lesions - An in vitro study.
Kreher D; Park KJ; Schmalz G; Schulz-Kornas E; Haak R; Ziebolz D
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Mar; 37():102675. PubMed ID: 34906738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
