179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34637890)
21. Light-based diagnostic methods for the in vivo assessment of initial caries lesions: Laser fluorescence, QLF and OCT.
Park KJ; Voigt A; Schneider H; Ziebolz D; Haak R
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2021 Jun; 34():102270. PubMed ID: 33785442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF): a tool for early occlusal dental caries detection and supporting decision making in vivo.
Alammari MR; Smith PW; de Josselin de Jong E; Higham SM
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 22940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Detection of dentin-exposed occlusal/incisal tooth wear using quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology.
Kim SK; Jung HI; Kim BI
J Dent; 2020 Dec; 103():103505. PubMed ID: 33080348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Association between quantitative measures obtained using fluorescence-based methods and activity status of occlusal caries lesions in primary molars.
Novaes TF; Reyes A; Matos R; Antunes-Pontes LR; Marques RP; Braga MM; Diniz MB; Mendes FM
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 May; 27(3):154-162. PubMed ID: 27320636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro Detection of Occlusal Caries on Permanent Teeth by a Visual, Light-Induced Fluorescence and Photothermal Radiometry and Modulated Luminescence Methods.
Jallad M; Zero D; Eckert G; Ferreira Zandona A
Caries Res; 2015; 49(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 26316073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting caries by measuring its activity using quantitative light-induced fluorescence in vivo: a 2-year caries increment analysis.
Meller C; Santamaria RM; Connert T; Splieth C
Caries Res; 2012; 46(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 22614242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of fluorescence imaging with reflectance enhancement technology for early caries detection.
Amaechi BT; Ramalingam K
Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 25000670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Occlusal caries detection on 3D models obtained with an intraoral scanner. A validation study.
Ntovas P; Michou S; Benetti AR; Bakhshandeh A; Ekstrand K; Rahiotis C; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104457. PubMed ID: 36858167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of primary caries detection on smooth surface in the maxillary anterior teeth using QLF, digital photo and visual diagnosis].
Feng Y; Yin W; Zhang YY; Zhang B; Hu DY
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16400479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Establishing quantitative light-induced fluorescence cut-offs for the detection of occlusal dentine lesions.
Kühnisch J; Ifland S; Tranaeus S; Angmar-Månsson B; Hickel R; Stösser L; Heinrich-Weltzien R
Eur J Oral Sci; 2006 Dec; 114(6):483-8. PubMed ID: 17184229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Caries lesions diagnosis with deep convolutional neural network in intraoral QLF images by handheld device.
Tan R; Zhu X; Chen S; Zhang J; Liu Z; Li Z; Fan H; Wang X; Yang L
BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):754. PubMed ID: 38951770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Red fluorescence intensity as a criterion for assessing remineralization efficacy in early carious lesions.
Kim HE
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2024 Feb; 45():103963. PubMed ID: 38184220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance of light-emitting diode device in detecting occlusal caries in the primary molars.
Diniz MB; Campos PH; Wilde S; Cordeiro RCL; Zandona AGF
Lasers Med Sci; 2019 Aug; 34(6):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 30673922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of in vitro demineralization adjacent to restorations using quantitative light induced fluorescence (QLF).
Pretty IA; Smith PW; Edgar WM; Higham SM
Dent Mater; 2003 Jul; 19(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 12742431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of quantitative light-induced fluorescence technology in diagnosing cracked teeth.
Lee JI; Jeon MJ; de Jong EJ; Jung HI; Jung IY; Park JW; Shin SJ
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Mar; 41():103299. PubMed ID: 36693456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validity assessment of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital (QLF-D) for the dental plaque scoring system: a cross-sectional study.
Lee JB; Choi DH; Mah YJ; Pang EK
BMC Oral Health; 2018 Nov; 18(1):187. PubMed ID: 30458753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Detection and monitoring of enamel early caries in vivo using red fluorescence analysis by quantitative light-induced fluorescence method].
Yin W; Feng Y; Hu DY; Ellwood RP; Pretty IA
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 28(3):278-81. PubMed ID: 20635657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An in vitro comparison of quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and spectrophotometer on monitoring artificial white spot lesions.
Kim HE; Kim BI
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2015 Sep; 12(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 26117198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical evaluation of demineralization and remineralization of intact root surface lesions in the clinic by a quantitative light-induced fluorescence system.
Durmusoglu O; Tağtekin DA; Yanikoğlu F
Lasers Med Sci; 2012 Mar; 27(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 21424800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Spatial agreement of demineralized areas in quantitative light-induced fluorescence images and digital photographs.
Tatano R; Berkels B; Ehrlich EE; Deserno TM; Fritz UB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180099. PubMed ID: 29851354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
