161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34639935)
1. Effect of Loading Angles and Implant Lengths on the Static and Fatigue Fractures of Dental Implants.
Sun F; Lv LT; Cheng W; Zhang JL; Ba DC; Song GQ; Lin Z
Materials (Basel); 2021 Sep; 14(19):. PubMed ID: 34639935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant fracture under dynamic fatigue loading: influence of embedded angle and depth of implant.
Suzuki H; Hata Y; Watanabe F
Odontology; 2016 Sep; 104(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 26698312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatigue properties of plasma nitriding for dental implant application.
Sun F; Cheng W; Zhao B; Lin Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):329.e1-329.e8. PubMed ID: 35339281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the fatigue life of dental implants: Numerical and experimental investigation on configuration effect.
Abdoli Z; Mohammadi B; Karimi HR
Med Eng Phys; 2024 Jan; 123():104078. PubMed ID: 38365331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Abutment Preparation and Fatigue Loading in a Moist Environment on the Fracture Resistance of the One-Piece Zirconia Dental Implant.
Kamel M; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):533-540. PubMed ID: 28494037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study.
Körtvélyessy G; Szabó ÁL; Pelsőczi-Kovács I; Tarjányi T; Tóth Z; Kárpáti K; Matusovits D; Hangyási BD; Baráth Z
Materials (Basel); 2023 Feb; 16(5):. PubMed ID: 36903102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fatigue resistance and fracture strength of narrow-diameter one-piece zirconia implants with angled abutments.
Atalay P; Öztaş DD
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Oct; 34(7):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 35855644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical testing of thin-walled zirconia abutments.
Canullo L; Coelho PG; Bonfante EA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 23559107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of Cyclic Fatigue Tests on Aging and Their Translational Implications for Survival of All-Ceramic Tooth-Borne Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Özcan M; Jonasch M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Apr; 27(4):364-375. PubMed ID: 27880023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the fracture resistance of dental implants with different abutment taper angles.
Wang K; Geng J; Jones D; Xu W
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Jun; 63():164-71. PubMed ID: 27040208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Static and fatigue strength of a novel anatomically contoured implant compared to five current open-wedge high tibial osteotomy plates.
Diffo Kaze A; Maas S; Belsey J; Hoffmann A; Pape D
J Exp Orthop; 2017 Dec; 4(1):39. PubMed ID: 29222607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic and static load performance of dental biomaterial systems with conical implant-abutment connections.
Basgil MC; Kurtoglu C; Soygun K; Uslan Y; Demi R T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2020; 31(5):319-328. PubMed ID: 33136087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical Performance of Charcot-Specific Implants.
Wukich DK; Liu GT; Raspovic K; Vicenzi F
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2021; 60(3):440-447. PubMed ID: 33612405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of straight versus angulated screw channel titanium bases on failure loads of two-piece ceramic and titanium implants restored with screw-retained monolithic crowns: An in-vitro study.
Helal E; Gierthmuehlen PC; Bonfante EA; Campos TMB; Prott LS; Langner R; Spitznagel FA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1217-1229. PubMed ID: 37565379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dental implant diameter on fatigue performance. Part I: mechanical behavior.
Shemtov-Yona K; Rittel D; Levin L; Machtei EE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22780911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Titanium vs Titanium-Zirconium Implant-Abutment Connections.
Leo SJ; Tan MY; Yee SHX; Lee FKF; Tan KBC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 35904830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.
Duan Y; Griggs JA
Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1711-1716. PubMed ID: 30220505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
