These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
28. Mechanical characterization of structurally porous biomaterials built via additive manufacturing: experiments, predictive models, and design maps for load-bearing bone replacement implants. Melancon D; Bagheri ZS; Johnston RB; Liu L; Tanzer M; Pasini D Acta Biomater; 2017 Nov; 63():350-368. PubMed ID: 28927929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Characterization and investigation of the deformation behavior of porous magnesium scaffolds with entangled architectured pore channels. Jiang G; Li Q; Wang C; Dong J; He G J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Dec; 64():139-50. PubMed ID: 27498424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Development of a biaxial compression device for biological samples: preliminary experimental results for a closed cell foam. Little JP; Tevelen G; Adam CJ; Evans JH; Pearcy MJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jul; 2(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 19627835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acoustic emission analysis of the compressive deformation of iron foams and their biocompatibility study. Park H; Hong K; Kang JS; Um T; Knapek M; Minárik P; Sung YE; Máthis K; Yamamoto A; Kim HK; Choe H Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Apr; 97():367-376. PubMed ID: 30678922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Foam trapping in a 3D porous medium: in situ observations by ultra-fast X-ray microtomography. Poryles R; Gland N; King A; Rosenberg E; Barré L; Chevalier T Soft Matter; 2020 Jul; 16(27):6354-6361. PubMed ID: 32568356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fabrication, pore structure and compressive behavior of anisotropic porous titanium for human trabecular bone implant applications. Li F; Li J; Xu G; Liu G; Kou H; Zhou L J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Jun; 46():104-14. PubMed ID: 25778351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. High-temperature deformation followed in situ by X-ray microtomography: a methodology to track features under large strain. Lhuissier P; Bormann T; Pelloux G; Bataillon X; Pelloux F; Josserond C; Gravier P; Blandin JJ; Boller E; Salvo L J Synchrotron Radiat; 2021 Mar; 28(Pt 2):530-537. PubMed ID: 33650566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cholla cactus frames as lightweight and torsionally tough biological materials. De Vivo L; Matsushita AK; Kupor D; Luna J; Tierra BA; Sah RL; Lubarda VA; Meyers MA; McKittrick JM; Krysl P; Kuester F Acta Biomater; 2020 Aug; 112():213-224. PubMed ID: 32413578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of glutaraldehyde and procyanidin cross-linked scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. Yang Y; Ritchie AC; Everitt NM Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Nov; 80():263-273. PubMed ID: 28866164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Nanocomposite-coated porous templates for engineered bone scaffolds: a parametric study of layer-by-layer assembly conditions. Ziminska M; Chalanqui MJ; Chambers P; Acheson JG; McCarthy HO; Dunne NJ; Hamilton AR Biomed Mater; 2019 Sep; 14(6):065008. PubMed ID: 31539364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Large-deformation and high-strength amorphous porous carbon nanospheres. Yang W; Mao S; Yang J; Shang T; Song H; Mabon J; Swiech W; Vance JR; Yue Z; Dillon SJ; Xu H; Xu B Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24187. PubMed ID: 27072412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A review of techniques for visualising soft tissue microstructure deformation and quantifying strain Ex Vivo. Disney CM; Lee PD; Hoyland JA; Sherratt MJ; Bay BK J Microsc; 2018 Dec; 272(3):165-179. PubMed ID: 29655273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Porous structure of fibre networks formed by a foaming process: a comparative study of different characterization techniques. Al-Qararah AM; Ekman A; Hjelt T; Kiiskinen H; Timonen J; Ketoja JA J Microsc; 2016 Oct; 264(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 27159162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]