These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34641732)

  • 21. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Apr; 171(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 18254685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Natural selection stops the evolution of male attractiveness.
    Hine E; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Mar; 108(9):3659-64. PubMed ID: 21321197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila.
    Rusuwa BB; Chung H; Allen SL; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    Curr Biol; 2022 Jul; 32(14):3161-3169.e7. PubMed ID: 35700732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection.
    Chenoweth SF; Rundle HD; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Jan; 171(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 18171148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2003 Oct; 57(10):2326-34. PubMed ID: 14628920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genomic Perspective on Multivariate Variation, Pleiotropy, and Evolution.
    Melo D; Marroig G; Wolf JB
    J Hered; 2019 Jul; 110(4):479-493. PubMed ID: 30986303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata.
    Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2005 Feb; 165(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 15729657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Selection on the Fly: Short-Term Adaptation to an Altered Sexual Selection Regime in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Barata C; Snook RR; Ritchie MG; Kosiol C
    Genome Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 15(7):. PubMed ID: 37341535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.
    Ruzicka F; Hill MS; Pennell TM; Flis I; Ingleby FC; Mott R; Fowler K; Morrow EH; Reuter M
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Apr; 17(4):e3000244. PubMed ID: 31022179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel.
    Mackay TF; Richards S; Stone EA; Barbadilla A; Ayroles JF; Zhu D; Casillas S; Han Y; Magwire MM; Cridland JM; Richardson MF; Anholt RR; Barrón M; Bess C; Blankenburg KP; Carbone MA; Castellano D; Chaboub L; Duncan L; Harris Z; Javaid M; Jayaseelan JC; Jhangiani SN; Jordan KW; Lara F; Lawrence F; Lee SL; Librado P; Linheiro RS; Lyman RF; Mackey AJ; Munidasa M; Muzny DM; Nazareth L; Newsham I; Perales L; Pu LL; Qu C; Ràmia M; Reid JG; Rollmann SM; Rozas J; Saada N; Turlapati L; Worley KC; Wu YQ; Yamamoto A; Zhu Y; Bergman CM; Thornton KR; Mittelman D; Gibbs RA
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7384):173-8. PubMed ID: 22318601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Artificial Selection to Increase the Phenotypic Variance in g
    Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2017 Nov; 190(5):707-723. PubMed ID: 29053361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing G: multivariate analysis of genetic variation in multiple populations.
    Aguirre JD; Hine E; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2014 Jan; 112(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 23486079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Between-sex genetic covariance constrains the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ingleby FC; Innocenti P; Rundle HD; Morrow EH
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1721-32. PubMed ID: 24893565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Beauty or function? The opposing effects of natural and sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons in male black field crickets.
    Mitchell C; Wylde Z; Del Castillo E; Rapkin J; House CM; Hunt J
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Sep; 36(9):1266-1281. PubMed ID: 37534753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The B-matrix harbors significant and sex-specific constraints on the evolution of multicharacter sexual dimorphism.
    Gosden TP; Shastri KL; Innocenti P; Chenoweth SF
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2106-16. PubMed ID: 22759288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genomic consequences of selection and genome-wide association mapping in soybean.
    Wen Z; Boyse JF; Song Q; Cregan PB; Wang D
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):671. PubMed ID: 26334313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.
    Gosden TP; Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Oct; 27(10):2106-12. PubMed ID: 25078542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evolutionary experiments on mate recognition in the Drosophila serrata species complex.
    Blows MW; Higgie M
    Genetica; 2002 Nov; 116(2-3):239-50. PubMed ID: 12555782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):371-84. PubMed ID: 25783700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evolutionary rates for multivariate traits: the role of selection and genetic variation.
    Pitchers W; Wolf JB; Tregenza T; Hunt J; Dworkin I
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2014 Aug; 369(1649):20130252. PubMed ID: 25002697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.