These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3464190)

  • 21. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Light-wire treatment of a Class II, division 1 subdivision malocclusion. An American Board of Orthodontics case report.
    Kelly MF
    Am J Orthod; 1986 Mar; 89(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 3456713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nonextraction treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusions.
    Arvystas MG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Nov; 88(5):380-95. PubMed ID: 3864372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mandibular plane changes during maxillary retraction. Part 2.
    Baumrind S; Molthen R; West EE; Miller DM
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 281871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uprighting the mandibular molars stimulates mandibular growth during treatment of class II malocclusion.
    Miyajima K; Yoshimoto J; Murata S; Kanomi R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 9391711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of Andresen, Harvold, and Begg treatment on overbite and molar eruption.
    Ball JV; Hunt NP
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Feb; 13(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2032568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stability of the lower labial segment following orthodontic treatment--a comparison of treatment with Andresen and Begg appliances.
    Sims AP; Springate SD
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7786861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An evaluation of combination second molar extraction and functional appliance therapy.
    Whitney EF; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Mar; 91(3):183-92. PubMed ID: 3469904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A cephalometric evaluation of pretreatment and post-treatment outcome using Tetragon analysis: a retrospective study.
    Bhasin VS; Tammannavar P; Pushpalatha C; Nayak SS; Viswanathan V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 23811652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.