BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34642795)

  • 1. Salvage minimally invasive esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can improve postoperative complications compared with salvage open esophagectomy.
    Ishiyama K; Oguma J; Kubo K; Kanematsu K; Kurita D; Daiko H
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3504-3510. PubMed ID: 34642795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
    Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A retrospective study of preoperative malnutrition based on the Controlling Nutritional Status score as an associated marker for short-term outcomes after open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Horinouchi T; Yoshida N; Harada K; Eto K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Iwagami S; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3367-3375. PubMed ID: 35976434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns of Recurrence and Long-Term Survival of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Sugimura K; Miyata H; Kanemura T; Takeoka T; Sugase T; Masuzawa T; Katsuyama S; Motoori M; Takeda Y; Murata K; Yano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jun; 27(6):1055-1065. PubMed ID: 36749557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Using a Nationwide Database in Japan.
    Takeuchi H; Miyata H; Ozawa S; Udagawa H; Osugi H; Matsubara H; Konno H; Seto Y; Kitagawa Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 28224366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may contribute to low incidence of postoperative surgical site infection in patients with poor glycemic control.
    Yamane T; Yoshida N; Horinouchi T; Morinaga T; Eto K; Harada K; Ogawa K; Sawayama H; Iwatsuki M; Baba Y; Miyamoto Y; Baba H
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Mar; 407(2):579-585. PubMed ID: 34459983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of a tailored surgical technique for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Javidfar J; Bacchetta M; Yang JA; Miller J; D'Ovidio F; Ginsburg ME; Gorenstein LA; Bessler M; Sonett JR
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 22500593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparisons of minimally invasive esophagectomy and open esophagectomy in lymph node metastasis/dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer.
    Li Z; Gai C; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Huang C; Zhao B; Tian Z
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Oct; 135(20):2446-2452. PubMed ID: 36507705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Up-Front Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy versus Open Esophagectomy on Quality of Life for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer.
    Li Z; Cheng J; Zhang Y; Wen S; Lv H; Xu Y; Zhu Y; Zhang Z; Mu D; Tian Z
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):693-701. PubMed ID: 33503901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
    Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
    Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Is Associated with Superior Survival Compared to Open Surgery.
    Ising MS; Smith SA; Trivedi JR; Martin RCG; Phillips P; Van Berkel V; Fox MP
    Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 35317621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population-Based Cohort Study from a Prospective National Registry: Better Long-Term Survival in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Compared with Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.
    Hayami M; Ndegwa N; Lindblad M; Linder G; Hedberg J; Edholm D; Johansson J; Lagergren J; Lundell L; Nilsson M; Rouvelas I
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):5609-5621. PubMed ID: 35752726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transition from open to minimally invasive en bloc esophagectomy can be achieved without compromising surgical quality.
    Kammili A; Cools-Lartigue J; Mulder D; Feldman LS; Ferri LE; Mueller CL
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3067-3076. PubMed ID: 32556773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted and conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy are associated with better postoperative results compared to hybrid and open transthoracic esophagectomy.
    van der Sluis PC; Babic B; Uzun E; Tagkalos E; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Apr; 48(4):776-782. PubMed ID: 34838394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Open Esophagectomy on Circulating Tumor Cell Level in Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.
    Wang HB; Guo Q; Li YH; Sun ZQ; Li TT; Zhang WX; Xiang SS; Li HF
    World J Surg; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1655-62. PubMed ID: 27020921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
    Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.
    Morimoto Y; Kawakubo H; Ishikawa A; Matsuda S; Hijikata N; Ando M; Mayanagi S; Irino T; Nakamura R; Wada N; Tsuji T; Kitagawa Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Apr; 15(2):270-278. PubMed ID: 34637190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally Invasive Versus Open McKeown for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
    Zheng Y; Li Y; Liu X; Sun H; Shen S; Ba Y; Wang Z; Liu S; Xing W
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6329-6336. PubMed ID: 33987755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.