179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34643807)
1. Fatigue behavior and stress distribution of molars restored with MOD inlays with and without deep margin elevation.
Grassi EDA; de Andrade GS; Tribst JPM; Machry RV; Valandro LF; Ramos NC; Bresciani E; Saavedra GSFA
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Mar; 26(3):2513-2526. PubMed ID: 34643807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution.
Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration.
Liu X; Fok A; Li H
Dent Mater; 2014 Mar; 30(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 24424091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of large MOD restorations: Composite resin inlays vs. short fiber-reinforced direct restorations.
Soares LM; Razaghy M; Magne P
Dent Mater; 2018 Apr; 34(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 29366492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays.
Ilgenstein I; Zitzmann NU; Bühler J; Wegehaupt FJ; Attin T; Weiger R; Krastl G
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25248949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of root-canal treated mandibular molars with intracoronal restorations: effect of thermocycling and mechanical loading.
Hitz T; Ozcan M; Göhring TN
J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 20157655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fatigue resistance and crack propensity of large MOD composite resin restorations: direct versus CAD/CAM inlays.
Batalha-Silva S; de Andrada MA; Maia HP; Magne P
Dent Mater; 2013 Mar; 29(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 23287406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.
Shembish FA; Tong H; Kaizer M; Janal MN; Thompson VP; Opdam NJ; Zhang Y
Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 26777092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Direct Restorative Materials in Proximal Box Elevation on the Margin Quality and Fracture Resistance of Molars Restored With CAD/CAM Onlays.
Grubbs TD; Vargas M; Kolker J; Teixeira EC
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 31084532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of preparation design on fracture strength of compromised molars restored with direct composite resin restorations: An in vitro and finite element analysis study.
Hofsteenge JW; Carvalho MA; Botenga ELF; Cune MS; Özcan M; Magne P; Gresnigt MMM
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1150-1158. PubMed ID: 38670907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars.
Bresser RA; van de Geer L; Gerdolle D; Schepke U; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103950. PubMed ID: 32957242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of mvM stress of inlays, onlays and endocrowns made from various materials and their bonding with molars in a computer simulation of mastication - FEA.
Dejak B; Młotkowski A
Dent Mater; 2020 Jul; 36(7):854-864. PubMed ID: 32473834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
