These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34644663)

  • 1. Estimators and confidence intervals of f
    Xu Z; Merino-Sanjuan M; Mangas-Sanjuan V; García-Arieta A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Nov; 212():106449. PubMed ID: 34644663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro dissolution profile comparison using bootstrap bias corrected similarity factor,
    Liu S; Cai X; Shen M; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jan; 34(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 36710402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of free software platforms for the calculation of the 90% confidence interval of f
    Noce L; Gwaza L; Mangas-Sanjuan V; Garcia-Arieta A
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2020 Apr; 146():105259. PubMed ID: 32058055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro dissolution profile comparison--statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2.
    Shah VP; Tsong Y; Sathe P; Liu JP
    Pharm Res; 1998 Jun; 15(6):889-96. PubMed ID: 9647355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dissolution profile similarity - Comparison between the f
    Paixão P; Gouveia LF; Silva N; Morais JA
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2017 Mar; 112():67-74. PubMed ID: 27865857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Dissolution Similarity Assessment Methods for Products with Large Variations: f
    Yoshida H; Shibata H; Izutsu KI; Goda Y
    Biol Pharm Bull; 2017; 40(5):722-725. PubMed ID: 28458360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
    Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of drug dissolution profiles: a proposal based on tolerance limits.
    Zhai S; Mathew T; Huang Y
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(29):5464-5476. PubMed ID: 27501158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulatory assessment of drug dissolution profiles comparability via maximum deviation.
    Moellenhoff K; Dette H; Kotzagiorgis E; Volgushev S; Collignon O
    Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(20):2968-2981. PubMed ID: 29862526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of the Regulatory Methods for the Comparison of Highly Variable Dissolution Profiles.
    Mangas-Sanjuan V; Colon-Useche S; Gonzalez-Alvarez I; Bermejo M; Garcia-Arieta A
    AAPS J; 2016 Nov; 18(6):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 27571779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
    Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals for the mean of diagnostic test charge data containing zeros.
    Zhou XH; Tu W
    Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1118-25. PubMed ID: 11129469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical modeling approaches for the comparison of dissolution profiles.
    Pourmohamad T; Ng HKT
    Pharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 22(2):328-348. PubMed ID: 36404126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of similarity between dissolution profiles.
    Ma MC; Wang BB; Liu JP; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2000 May; 10(2):229-49. PubMed ID: 10803727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Permutation Test (PT) and Tolerated Difference Test (TDT): two new, robust and powerful nonparametric tests for statistical comparison of dissolution profiles.
    Gómez-Mantilla JD; Casabó VG; Schaefer UF; Lehr CM
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Jan; 441(1-2):458-67. PubMed ID: 23194886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.