These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34646495)

  • 1. Transferability of correlative and process-based species distribution models revisited: A response to Booth.
    Higgins SI; Larcombe MJ; Beeton NJ; Conradi T
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Oct; 11(19):13613-13617. PubMed ID: 34646495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive ability of a process-based versus a correlative species distribution model.
    Higgins SI; Larcombe MJ; Beeton NJ; Conradi T; Nottebrock H
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):11043-11054. PubMed ID: 33144947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area.
    Shabani F; Kumar L; Ahmadi M
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Aug; 6(16):5973-86. PubMed ID: 27547370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A problem with variable selection in a comparison of correlative and process-based species distribution models: Comments on Higgins et al., 2020.
    Booth TH
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Oct; 11(19):13609-13612. PubMed ID: 34646494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The predictive performance and stability of six species distribution models.
    Duan RY; Kong XQ; Huang MY; Fan WY; Wang ZG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112764. PubMed ID: 25383906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collinearity in ecological niche modeling: Confusions and challenges.
    Feng X; Park DS; Liang Y; Pandey R; Papeş M
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Sep; 9(18):10365-10376. PubMed ID: 31624555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological invasions reveal how niche change affects the transferability of species distribution models.
    Liu C; Wolter C; Courchamp F; Roura-Pascual N; Jeschke JM
    Ecology; 2022 Aug; 103(8):e3719. PubMed ID: 35388469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting the distribution of a rare chipmunk (
    Perkins-Taylor IE; Frey JK
    J Mammal; 2020 Aug; 101(4):1035-1048. PubMed ID: 33033469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multi-Scenario Species Distribution Modeling.
    Senay SD; Worner SP
    Insects; 2019 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 30832259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Niche variability and its consequences for species distribution modeling.
    Michel MJ; Knouft JH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e44932. PubMed ID: 22970325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Species distribution model transferability and model grain size - finer may not always be better.
    Manzoor SA; Griffiths G; Lukac M
    Sci Rep; 2018 May; 8(1):7168. PubMed ID: 29740002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Species distribution models and empirical test: Comparing predictions with well-understood geographical distribution of
    Sarquis JA; Cristaldi MA; Arzamendia V; Bellini G; Giraudo AR
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 8(21):10497-10509. PubMed ID: 30464822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explanative power of variables used in species distribution modelling: an issue of general model transferability or niche shift in the invasive Greenhouse frog (Eleutherodactylus planirostris).
    Rödder D; Lötters S
    Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Sep; 97(9):781-96. PubMed ID: 20617298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Combined Use of Correlative and Mechanistic Species Distribution Models Benefits Low Conservation Status Species.
    Rougier T; Lassalle G; Drouineau H; Dumoulin N; Faure T; Deffuant G; Rochard E; Lambert P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139194. PubMed ID: 26426280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Climatic associations of British species distributions show good transferability in time but low predictive accuracy for range change.
    Rapacciuolo G; Roy DB; Gillings S; Fox R; Walker K; Purvis A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40212. PubMed ID: 22792243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling the geographical distributions of
    De Vivo M; Huang JP
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e9546. PubMed ID: 36447597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved prediction of Canada lynx distribution through regional model transferability and data efficiency.
    Olson LE; Bjornlie N; Hanvey G; Holbrook JD; Ivan JS; Jackson S; Kertson B; King T; Lucid M; Murray D; Naney R; Rohrer J; Scully A; Thornton D; Walker Z; Squires JR
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Feb; 11(4):1667-1690. PubMed ID: 33613997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating mechanistic and correlative niche models to unravel range-limiting processes in a temperate amphibian.
    Enriquez-Urzelai U; Kearney MR; Nicieza AG; Tingley R
    Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Aug; 25(8):2633-2647. PubMed ID: 31050846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unpacking the mechanisms captured by a correlative species distribution model to improve predictions of climate refugia.
    Briscoe NJ; Kearney MR; Taylor CA; Wintle BA
    Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Jul; 22(7):2425-39. PubMed ID: 26960136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ecological niche transferability using invasive species as a case study.
    Fernández M; Hamilton H
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119891. PubMed ID: 25785858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.