These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34646714)

  • 1. Development and Test-Item Analysis of a Freely Available 1900-Item Question Bank for Rheumatology Trainees.
    Kumar B; Suneja M; Swee ML
    Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e18382. PubMed ID: 34646714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item analysis and optimizing multiple-choice questions for a viable question bank in ophthalmology: A cross-sectional study.
    Bhat SK; Prasad KHL
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Feb; 69(2):343-346. PubMed ID: 33463588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of a 25-item low-stakes multiple-choice assessment of bronchoscopic knowledge.
    Quadrelli S; Davoudi M; Galíndez F; Colt HG
    Chest; 2009 Feb; 135(2):315-321. PubMed ID: 18849404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Item Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions in Teaching Prosthodontics.
    Madhav VN
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Nov; 79(11):1314-9. PubMed ID: 26522636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Item analysis of multiple choice questions: A quality assurance test for an assessment tool.
    Kumar D; Jaipurkar R; Shekhar A; Sikri G; Srinivas V
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2021 Feb; 77(Suppl 1):S85-S89. PubMed ID: 33612937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.
    Notebaert AJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 27472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Multiple Choice Questions for Post Graduate Dental Entrance Examinations Spot On?-Item Analysis of MCQs in Prosthodontics in India.
    Shigli K; Nayak SS; Gali S; Sankeshwari B; Fulari D; Shyam Kishore K; Upadhya P N; Jirge V
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2018 Oct; 110(5):455-458. PubMed ID: 30129514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS® Depression Item Bank: an illustration of classical test theory methods.
    Nolte S; Coon C; Hudgens S; Verdam MGE
    J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2019 Jul; 3(1):46. PubMed ID: 31359212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties of a novel knowledge assessment tool of mechanical ventilation for emergency medicine residents in the northeastern United States.
    Richards JB; Strout TD; Seigel TA; Wilcox SR
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2016; 13():10. PubMed ID: 26924540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-validation item analysis to assess the validity and reliability of multiple-choice questions at a medical college with an innovative curriculum.
    Yahia AIO
    Natl Med J India; 2021; 34(6):359-362. PubMed ID: 35818102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Multiple-Choice Questions by Item Analysis, from an Online Internal Assessment of 6
    Bhattacherjee S; Mukherjee A; Bhandari K; Rout AJ
    Indian J Community Med; 2022; 47(1):92-95. PubMed ID: 35368481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.
    Stump TA; Eng ML
    J Affect Disord; 2018 Oct; 238():645-650. PubMed ID: 29957482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of a delirium knowledge test for intensive care nurses: A validity and reliability study.
    Öztürk Birge A; Tel Aydın H; Salman F
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2020 Dec; 61():102900. PubMed ID: 32675040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using item analysis to evaluate hand hygiene self-assessments at Alberta health services.
    Kumar V
    Am J Infect Control; 2023 Jun; 51(6):683-686. PubMed ID: 36181918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale.
    Young M; Cummings BA; St-Onge C
    Perspect Med Educ; 2017 Feb; 6(1):21-28. PubMed ID: 28050882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.