348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34646885)
1. Variations in Soft and Hard Tissues following Immediate Implant Placement versus Delayed Implant Placement following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Santhanakrishnan M; Ramesh N; Kamaleeshwari R; Subramanian V
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():5641185. PubMed ID: 34646885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic and Esthetic Evaluation Following Immediate Implant Placement with or without Socket Shield and Delayed Implant Placement Following Socket Preservation in the Maxillary Esthetic Region - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Santhanakrishnan M; Subramanian V; Ramesh N; Kamaleeshwari R
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2021; 13():479-494. PubMed ID: 34824552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):361-72. PubMed ID: 26669546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate loading of post-extractive versus delayed placed single implants in the anterior maxilla: outcome of a pragmatic multicenter randomised controlled trial 1-year after loading.
Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Grandi G; Tuco L; Felice P
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2015; 8(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 26669545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Immediate non-occlusal loading of immediate post-extractive versus delayed placement of single implants in preserved sockets of the anterior maxilla: 4-month post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Felice P; Soardi E; Piattelli M; Pistilli R; Jacotti M; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):329-44. PubMed ID: 22282730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the soft and hard peri-implant tissue dimensional changes around single immediate implants in the esthetic zone with socket shield technique versus using xenograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Atef M; El Barbary A; Dahrous MSE; Zahran AF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):456-465. PubMed ID: 34028974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate single-tooth implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation in bony defect sites in the esthetic region: A 5-year randomized controlled trial.
Slagter KW; Meijer HJA; Hentenaar DFM; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM
J Periodontol; 2021 Dec; 92(12):1738-1748. PubMed ID: 33724473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate Implant Placement in Intact Fresh Extraction Sockets Using Vestibular Socket Therapy Versus Partial Extraction Therapy in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Elaskary A; Abdelrahman H; Elfahl B; Elsabagh H; El-Kimary G; Ghallab NA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 37279214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The bone shielding versus dual-zone concept in treating thin-walled fresh extraction sockets with immediate implant placement: Soft and hard tissue changes. A randomized clinical trial.
Elaskary A; Ghallab N; Thabet A; Shemais N
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Feb; 26(1):66-77. PubMed ID: 37669913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socket shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. Randomized clinical trial.
Abd-Elrahman A; Shaheen M; Askar N; Atef M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Oct; 22(5):602-611. PubMed ID: 32757311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single post-extractive ultra-wide 7 mm-diameter implants versus implants placed in molar healed sites after socket preservation for molar replacement: 6-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
Tallarico M; Xhanari E; Pisano M; De Riu G; Tullio A; Meloni SM
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(3):263-275. PubMed ID: 27722224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of soft tissue and labial plate of bone stability with immediate implant in direct contact versus gap with socket shield: A randomized clinical trial with 1 year follow-up.
Abdullah AH; Abdel Gaber HK; Adel-Khattab D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):548-558. PubMed ID: 35763398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate implant placement utilizing vestibular socket therapy versus early implant placement with contour augmentation for rehabilitation of compromised extraction sockets in the esthetic zone: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
ElAskary A; Elfana A; Meabed M; Abd-ElWahab Radi I; Akram M; Fawzy El-Sayed K
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 24(5):559-568. PubMed ID: 35811090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maintenance of marginal bone support and soft tissue esthetics at immediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed implants placed into extraction sites: 2-year results.
Noelken R; Neffe BA; Kunkel M; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 23316954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and aesthetic outcomes of immediately placed single-tooth implants with immediate vs. delayed restoration in the anterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study.
Arora H; Ivanovski S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Mar; 29(3):346-352. PubMed ID: 29453828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Effect of Implants Placed in Preserved Sockets Versus Fresh Sockets on Tissue Preservation and Esthetics: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
Zhou X; Yang J; Wu L; Tang X; Mou Y; Sun W; Hu Q; Xie S
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Dec; 19(4):101336. PubMed ID: 31843184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports.
Shadid RM
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):110. PubMed ID: 35382808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wide diameter immediate post-extractive implants vs delayed placement of normal-diameter implants in preserved sockets in the molar region: 1-year post-loading outcome of a randomised controlled trial.
Checchi V; Felice P; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Piattelli M; Pistilli R; Grandi G; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(3):263-278. PubMed ID: 28944355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molar replacement with 7 mm-wide diameter implants: to place the implant immediately or to wait 4 months after socket preservation?
1 year after loading results from a randomised controlled trial.
Tallarico M; Xhanari E; Pisano M; Gatti F; Meloni SM
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(2):169-178. PubMed ID: 28555207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes and Pink Esthetics After Immediate Implant Placement with Socket Shield and Conventional Techniques: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Venkatraman N; Jain V; Nanda A; Koli DK
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 36(6):674-680. PubMed ID: 38109387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
