130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34646966)
1. Setup Accuracy in Craniospinal Irradiation: Implications for Planning Treatment Volume Margins.
Novak J; Du D; Shinde A; Li R; Amini A; Chen YJ; Wong J; Han C; Neylon J; Liu A; Glaser S
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2021; 6(5):100747. PubMed ID: 34646966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Daily setup uncertainty analysis for craniospinal irradiation using helical tomotherapy.
Al-Wassia R; Bahig H; Poon E; Parker W; Freeman C
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2013; 3(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 24674409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors using megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) during image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) on helical tomotherapy (HT).
Gupta T; Upasani M; Master Z; Patil A; Phurailatpam R; Nojin S; Kannan S; Godasastri J; Jalali R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Feb; 14(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 24325133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Setup error analysis in helical tomotherapy based image-guided radiation therapy treatments.
Thondykandy BA; Swamidas JV; Agarwal J; Gupta T; Laskar SG; Mahantshetty U; Iyer SS; Mukherjee IU; Shrivastava SK; Deshpande DD
J Med Phys; 2015; 40(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 26865760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the Need for Daily Image Guidance in Head and Neck Cancers Treated with Helical Tomotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis of a Large Number of Daily Imaging-based Corrections.
Saha A; Mallick I; Das P; Shrimali RK; Achari R; Chatterjee S
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 26746002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Residual setup errors in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery without six degree of freedom robotic couch: Frameless versus rigid immobilization systems.
Liu RJ; Yang SX; Neylon J; Hall MD; Dandapani S; Vora N; Wong JYC; Liu A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 21(3):87-93. PubMed ID: 32068342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of interfraction patient setup for head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy using multiple computed tomography-based image guidance.
Qi XS; Hu AY; Lee SP; Lee P; DeMarco J; Li XA; Steinberg ML; Kupelian P; Low D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 23474111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of planning target volume margin when using a robotic radiosurgery system to treat lung tumors with spine tracking.
James J; Swanson C; Lynch B; Wang B; Dunlap NE
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e337-43. PubMed ID: 25532489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Feng CH; Gerry E; Chmura SJ; Hasan Y; Al-Hallaq HA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 25442344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local setup reproducibility of the spinal column when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for craniospinal irradiation with patient in supine position.
Stoiber EM; Giske K; Schubert K; Sterzing F; Habl G; Uhl M; Herfarth K; Bendl R; Debus J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1552-9. PubMed ID: 20888708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Residual positioning errors and uncertainties for pediatric craniospinal irradiation and the impact of image guidance.
Gram D; Haraldsson A; Brodin NP; Nysom K; Björk-Eriksson T; Munck Af Rosenschöld P
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jun; 15(1):149. PubMed ID: 32522233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An assessment of action levels in imaging strategies in head and neck cancer using TomoTherapy. Are our margins adequate in the absence of image guidance?
Houghton F; Benson RJ; Tudor GS; Fairfoul J; Gemmill J; Dean JC; Routsis DS; Jefferies SJ; Burnet NG
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Nov; 21(9):720-7. PubMed ID: 19740637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy to the Mediastinum for Lymphoma Patients: Setup Uncertainties and Margins.
Aristophanous M; Chi PM; Kao J; Williamson R; Tung S; Andraos T; Milgrom SA; Pinnix CC; Dabaja BS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jan; 100(1):254-262. PubMed ID: 29100788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography.
Li W; Sahgal A; Foote M; Millar BA; Jaffray DA; Letourneau D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 22401920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?
Luo J; Yin Z; Zhang Z; Guo X; Yu X; Wang J
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 34344403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of immobilisation and image guidance protocol on planning target volume margins for supine craniospinal irradiation.
Krishnatry R; Gudi S; Siwach A; Patil A; Rajesh RK; Shekhar HK; Sutar V; Chatterjee A; Goda JS; Jalali R; Gupta T
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2022; 27(2):250-259. PubMed ID: 36299390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Residual setup errors caused by rotation and non-rigid motion in prone-treated cervical cancer patients after online CBCT image-guidance.
Ahmad R; Hoogeman MS; Quint S; Mens JW; Osorio EM; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jun; 103(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 22633814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ratio of weight loss to planning target volume significantly impacts setup errors in nasopharyngeal cancer patients undergoing helical tomotherapy with daily megavoltage computed tomography.
Hou WH; Wang CW; Tsai CL; Hsu FM; Cheng JC
Radiol Oncol; 2016 Dec; 50(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 27904451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy.
Grills IS; Hugo G; Kestin LL; Galerani AP; Chao KK; Wloch J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 18029110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying appropriate PTV setup margins: analysis of patient setup fidelity and intrafraction motion using post-treatment megavoltage computed tomography scans.
Drabik DM; MacKenzie MA; Fallone GB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jul; 68(4):1222-8. PubMed ID: 17637395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
