These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34647757)

  • 1. Parsimony in model selection: Tools for assessing fit propensity.
    Falk CF; Muthukrishna M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):123-136. PubMed ID: 34647757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the fitting propensity of factor models.
    Bader M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36201821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Model fit is a fallible indicator of model quality in quantitative psychopathology research: A reply to Bader and Moshagen.
    Greene AL; Eaton NR; Forbes MK; Fried EI; Watts AL; Kotov R; Krueger RF
    J Psychopathol Clin Sci; 2022 Aug; 131(6):696-703. PubMed ID: 35901397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occam's Razor in sensorimotor learning.
    Genewein T; Braun DA
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 May; 281(1783):20132952. PubMed ID: 24671968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
    Foffi G; Pastore A; Piazza F; Temussi PA
    Phys Biol; 2013 Aug; 10(4):040301. PubMed ID: 23912807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing the impossible: Visualizing latent variable models with flexplavaan.
    Fife DA; Brunwasser SM; Merkle EC
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; 28(6):1456-1477. PubMed ID: 35084889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strong theory testing using the prior predictive and the data prior.
    Vanpaemel W
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Jan; 127(1):136-145. PubMed ID: 31886703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation models.
    Jobst LJ; Bader M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):207-221. PubMed ID: 34672644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. dynamic : An R Package for Deriving Dynamic Fit Index Cutoffs for Factor Analysis.
    Wolf MG; McNeish D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):189-194. PubMed ID: 36787513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit indices for mean structures with growth curve models.
    Yuan KH; Zhang Z; Deng L
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 30372100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multimodel ranking and inference in ground water modeling.
    Poeter E; Anderson D
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 16029184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Occam's Razor Is a Razor of the People.
    Blanchard T; Lombrozo T; Nichols S
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42(4):1345-1359. PubMed ID: 29160570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A taxonomy of path-related goodness-of-fit indices and recommended criterion values.
    Lance CE; Beck SS; Fan Y; Carter NT
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):388-404. PubMed ID: 27213979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Key Concepts in Model Selection: Performance and Generalizability.
    Forster MR
    J Math Psychol; 2000 Mar; 44(1):205-231. PubMed ID: 10733865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Meta-analytic structural equation modeling with moderating effects on SEM parameters.
    Jak S; Cheung MW
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):430-455. PubMed ID: 31670537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of measurement quality on targeted structural model fit indices: A comment on Lance, Beck, Fan, and Carter (2016).
    McNeish D; Hancock GR
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):184-190. PubMed ID: 29517268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit in structural equation modeling.
    Moshagen M; Auerswald M
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Jun; 23(2):318-336. PubMed ID: 28301200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian Model Averaging for Propensity Score Analysis.
    Kaplan D; Chen J
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014; 49(6):505-17. PubMed ID: 26735355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are fit indices used to test psychopathology structure biased? A simulation study.
    Greene AL; Eaton NR; Li K; Forbes MK; Krueger RF; Markon KE; Waldman ID; Cicero DC; Conway CC; Docherty AR; Fried EI; Ivanova MY; Jonas KG; Latzman RD; Patrick CJ; Reininghaus U; Tackett JL; Wright AGC; Kotov R
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Oct; 128(7):740-764. PubMed ID: 31318246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.
    Altinisik Y; Van Lissa CJ; Hoijtink H; Oldehinkel AJ; Kuiper RM
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Oct; 26(5):599-621. PubMed ID: 34855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.