These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34647788)

  • 1. A multilingual preregistered replication of the semantic mismatch effect on serial recall.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Buchner A; Saint-Aubin J; Sonier RP; Marsh JE; Moore SB; Kershaw MBA; Ljung R; Arnström S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):966-974. PubMed ID: 34647788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic priming by irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Körner U; Buchner A; Bell R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1205-1210. PubMed ID: 27798754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    Neely CB; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 10087854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Boundaries of semantic distraction: dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.
    Marsh JE; Perham N; Sörqvist P; Jones DM
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1285-301. PubMed ID: 24993544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The way in which foreign words are learned determines their use in isolation and within sentences.
    García-Gámez AB; Macizo P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):364-379. PubMed ID: 31120267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bilingual brain turns a blind eye to negative statements in the second language.
    Jończyk R; Boutonnet B; Musiał K; Hoemann K; Thierry G
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):527-40. PubMed ID: 26926623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sentence repetition: what does the task measure?
    Polišenská K; Chiat S; Roy P
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2015; 50(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 25208477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weaker semantic priming effects with number words in the second language of math learning.
    Lachelin R; Marinova M; Reynvoet B; Schiltz C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Mar; 153(3):706-719. PubMed ID: 38127554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delta-band neural activity primarily tracks sentences instead of semantic properties of words.
    Lu Y; Jin P; Pan X; Ding N
    Neuroimage; 2022 May; 251():118979. PubMed ID: 35143977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic and phonological contributions to short-term repetition and long-term cued sentence recall.
    Meltzer JA; Rose NS; Deschamps T; Leigh RC; Panamsky L; Silberberg A; Madani N; Links KA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):307-29. PubMed ID: 26374330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological measures of language processing in bilinguals.
    Proverbio AM; Cok B; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):994-1017. PubMed ID: 12419124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall.
    Buchner A; Mehl B; Rothermund K; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1055-62. PubMed ID: 17128604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal distraction by background speech: what role for meaning?
    Marsh JE; Jones DM
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):210-6. PubMed ID: 20871175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preregistered replication and extension of the cocktail party phenomenon: One's name captures attention, unexpected words do not.
    Röer JP; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):234-242. PubMed ID: 32833466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sign and Speech Share Partially Overlapping Conceptual Representations.
    Evans S; Price CJ; Diedrichsen J; Gutierrez-Sigut E; MacSweeney M
    Curr Biol; 2019 Nov; 29(21):3739-3747.e5. PubMed ID: 31668623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.