BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34648722)

  • 1. Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Adolescent and Young Adults with Cervical Cancer.
    Pan S; Jiang W; Xie S; Zhu H; Zhu X
    Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211051558. PubMed ID: 34648722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival.
    Quinn BA; Deng X; Colton A; Bandyopadhyay D; Carter JS; Fields EC
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 30361045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nomograms predicting the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients with stage IIIC1 cervical cancer.
    Feng Y; Wang Y; Xie Y; Wu S; Li Y; Li M
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):450. PubMed ID: 33892663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calculating the overall survival probability in patients with cervical cancer: a nomogram and decision curve analysis-based study.
    Xie G; Wang R; Shang L; Qi C; Yang L; Huang L; Yang W; Chung MC
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):833. PubMed ID: 32873257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics and Treatments of Patients Aged 65 Years or Over with Cervical Cancer.
    Xie S; Pan S; Zou S; Zhu H; Zhu X
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():841-851. PubMed ID: 32606624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of tumor size on survival in cancer of the cervix and validation of stage IIA1 and IIA2 subdivisions.
    Wagner AE; Pappas L; Ghia AJ; Gaffney DK
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Jun; 129(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 23528928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence, prognostic factors and a nomogram of cervical cancer with distant organ metastasis: a SEER-based study.
    Shan Y; Ding Z; Cui Z; Chen A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2181690. PubMed ID: 36927263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative clinicopathological factors affecting cervical adenocarcinoma: Stages I-IIB.
    Zhou J; Chen Y; Xu X; Yan D; Lou H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(2):e9323. PubMed ID: 29480826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fertility-conserving surgery for young women with stage IA1 cervical cancer: safety and access.
    Wright JD; Nathavithrana R; Lewin SN; Sun X; Deutsch I; Burke WM; Herzog TJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 115(3):585-590. PubMed ID: 20177290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.
    Li H; Pang Y; Cheng X
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e8. PubMed ID: 31788998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Gülseren V; Kocaer M; Çakır İ; Özdemir İA; Sancı M; Güngördük K
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jul; 40(5):699-704. PubMed ID: 31607197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence, clinical risk and prognostic factors for liver metastasis in patients with cervical cancer: a population-based retrospective study.
    Liu H; Ye X; Li D; Yao Q; Li Y
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):421. PubMed ID: 33863313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The local treatment modalities in FIGO stage I-II small-cell carcinoma of the cervix are determined by disease stage and lymph node status.
    Zhou J; Yang HY; Wu SG; He ZY; Lin HX; Sun JY; Li Q; Guo ZW
    Cancer Med; 2016 Jun; 5(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26990881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of cervical adenocarcinoma.
    Wang M; Yuan B; Zhou ZH; Han WW
    Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7506. PubMed ID: 33820927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical Cancer in Women Aged 35 Years and Younger.
    Pelkofski E; Stine J; Wages NA; Gehrig PA; Kim KH; Cantrell LA
    Clin Ther; 2016 Mar; 38(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 26899314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comprehensive lymphadenectomy and survival prediction in uterine serous cancer patients after surgery: A population-based analysis.
    Li H; Xie X; Liu Y; Huang X; Lin H; Li J; Lin Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 32402510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinicopathologic features, incidence, and survival trends of gynecologic neuroendocrine tumors: a SEER database analysis.
    Gibbs J; Mei S; Economos K; Lee YC; Kanis MJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):53.e1-53.e6. PubMed ID: 30849352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of cervical cancer with different histological types: A population-based cohort study.
    Meng Y; Chu T; Lin S; Wu P; Zhi W; Peng T; Ding W; Luo D; Wu P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 163(3):545-551. PubMed ID: 34740461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FIGO stage, histology, histologic grade, age and race as prognostic factors in determining survival for cancers of the female gynecological system: an analysis of 1973-87 SEER cases of cancers of the endometrium, cervix, ovary, vulva, and vagina.
    Kosary CL
    Semin Surg Oncol; 1994; 10(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 8115784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A nomogram to predict prognosis after surgery in early stage non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients.
    Sun F; Ma K; Yang X; Li M; Shi Y; Zhan C; Jiang W; Wang Q
    Int J Surg; 2017 Jun; 42():11-16. PubMed ID: 28428062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.