124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34649170)
1. Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers.
Teixeira BG; Araújo VL; Santos TRT; Magalhães FA; Resende RA; Schallig W; van der Krogt MM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
Gait Posture; 2022 Jan; 91():48-51. PubMed ID: 34649170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing the kinematic output of the Oxford and Rizzoli Foot Models during normal gait and voluntary pathological gait in healthy adults.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; McCahill J; Stebbins J; Leardini A; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():126-132. PubMed ID: 32920448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the rigidity and forefoot - Rearfoot kinematics from three forefoot tracking marker clusters during walking and weight-bearing foot pronation-supination.
Magalhães FA; Souza TR; Araújo VL; Oliveira LM; Silveira LP; Ocarino JM; Fonseca ST
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 98():109381. PubMed ID: 31676084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of relationship between foot arch, hindfoot, and hallux motion using Oxford foot model: Comparison between walking and running.
Shono H; Matsumoto Y; Kokubun T; Tsuruta A; Miyazawa T; Kobayashi A; Kanemura N
Gait Posture; 2022 Feb; 92():96-102. PubMed ID: 34839207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.
Hulshof CM; Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Streekstra GJ; Kleipool RP; Gg Dobbe J; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2024 Mar; 166():112001. PubMed ID: 38527409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Between-day reliability of a cluster-based method for multisegment kinematic analysis of the foot-ankle complex.
Souza TR; Fonseca HL; Vaz AC; Antero JS; Marinho CS; Fonseca ST
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Nov; 104(6):601-9. PubMed ID: 25514272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of soft tissue artifacts on multi-segment foot kinematics.
Schallig W; Streekstra GJ; Hulshof CM; Kleipool RP; Dobbe JGG; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM; van den Noort JC
J Biomech; 2021 May; 120():110359. PubMed ID: 33730563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Repeatability of the modified Oxford foot model during gait in healthy adults.
Wright CJ; Arnold BL; Coffey TG; Pidcoe PE
Gait Posture; 2011 Jan; 33(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 21081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can orthotic wedges change the lower-extremity and multi-segment foot kinematics during gait in people with plantar fasciitis?
Harutaichun P; Vongsirinavarat M; Pakpakorn P; Sathianpantarit P; Richards J
Gait Posture; 2022 Sep; 97():174-183. PubMed ID: 35964335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forefoot midsole stiffness affects forefoot and rearfoot kinematics during the stance phase of gait.
Resende RA; Fonseca ST; Silva PL; Pertence AE; Kirkwood RN
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 104(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 24725040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marker placement sensitivity of the Oxford and Rizzoli foot models in adults and children.
Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Maas M; Harlaar J; van der Krogt MM
J Biomech; 2021 Sep; 126():110629. PubMed ID: 34320419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of a multi-segment foot model in a neutral cushioning shoe during treadmill walking.
Balsdon MER; Dombroski CE
J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():60. PubMed ID: 30473733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex.
Gomes RBO; Souza TR; Paes BDC; Magalhães FA; Gontijo BA; Fonseca ST; Ocarino JM; Resende RA
Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():20-23. PubMed ID: 30780086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Normative rearfoot motion during barefoot and shod walking using biplane fluoroscopy.
Campbell KJ; Wilson KJ; LaPrade RF; Clanton TO
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Apr; 24(4):1402-8. PubMed ID: 24902926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cranio-caudal and medio-lateral navicular translation are representative surrogate measures of foot function in asymptomatic adults during walking.
Eichelberger P; Pohl J; Jaspers T; Ferraro M; Krause F; Baur H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208175. PubMed ID: 30517158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.
Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J
J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
