138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3464919)
1. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A stepwedge quality assurance test for machine and processor in dental radiography.
Manson-Hing LR; Bloxom RM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1985 Jun; 110(6):910-3. PubMed ID: 3860550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of aluminum-copper alloy filtration on photon spectra, air kerma rate and image contrast.
Gonçalves A; Rollo JM; Gonçalves M; Haiter Neto F; Bóscolo FN
Braz Dent J; 2004; 15(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 15798826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of tomographic motion, slice thickness, and object thickness on film density.
Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 8653473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
Hedin M
Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variations in film exposure, effective kVp, and HVL among thirty-five dental x-ray units.
Preece JW; Jensen CW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Dec; 56(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 6581465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A laboratory evaluation of four quality control devices for radiographic processing.
Rushton VE; Horner K
J Dent; 1994 Aug; 22(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 7962896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
