These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465060)
1. Post-cementation sensitivity commonly associated with the "anhydrous" forms of glass ionomer luting cements: a theory. Simmons JJ Tex Dent J; 1986 Oct; 103(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 3465060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pulpal sensitivity between a conventional and two resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements. Smales RJ; Gale MS Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):442-6. PubMed ID: 12216561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The successful use of glass ionomer luting cements without post-cementation sensitivity. Berry EA; Berry LL Tex Dent J; 1987 Feb; 104(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 3469778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response. Heys RJ; Fitzgerald M; Heys DR; Charbeneau GT J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 May; 114(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 3474264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of castings cemented with glass-ionomer cements. Graver H; Trowbridge H; Alperstein K Oper Dent; 1990; 15(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 2367242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass-ionomer cements in dental practice: a national survey. Klausner LH; Brandau HE; Charbeneau GT Oper Dent; 1989; 14(4):170-5. PubMed ID: 2639316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Glass ionomer as a luting material. Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 2404045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reported sensitivity to glass ionomer luting cements. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 Sep; 109(3):476. PubMed ID: 6592235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Long term clinical evaluation of three luting materials. Pameijer CH; Nilner K Swed Dent J; 1994; 18(1-2):59-67. PubMed ID: 8052953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of patient-perceived postcementation sensitivity with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements. Bebermeyer RD; Berg JH Quintessence Int; 1994 Mar; 25(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 8008822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monkey pulpal responses to conventional and adhesive luting cements. Inokoshi S; Fujitani M; Otsuki M; Sonoda H; Kitasako Y; Shimada Y; Tagami J Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9610329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cement. Yoneda S; Morigami M; Sugizaki J; Yamada T Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 15709497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulpal response to a glass-ionomer cement. Histological study in dogs. Holland Junior C; Takayama S; Russo M; Komatsu J; Sasaki T; Quintella LP Rev Fac Odontol Aracatuba; 1978; 7(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 297972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation. Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevention of tooth hypersensitivity caused by the hydrodynamic action of zinc phosphate and composite resin luting cements (SEM) study. Khalil AH; Mokhtar AH; Sherif AH; Badawi BA Egypt Dent J; 1994 Oct; 40(4):923-6. PubMed ID: 9588136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biocompatibility of glass-ionomers: review of the literature]. Bonte E Chir Dent Fr; 1989 Apr; 59(469):55-6. PubMed ID: 2692987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]