243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34651445)
1. Trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer: The role of surgical and radiation treatment parameters in the development of anastomotic complications.
Alfaifi S; Chu R; Hui X; Broderick S; Hooker C; Brock M; Bush E; Hales R; Anderson L; Hoff J; Friedes C; Han-Oh S; Mcnutt T; Ha J; Yang S; Battafarano R; Feliciano J; Voong KR
Thorac Cancer; 2021 Dec; 12(23):3121-3129. PubMed ID: 34651445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Facility Type Affects Anastomotic Complications After Esophagectomy.
Morse RT; Mouw TJ; Moreno M; Erwin JT; Cao Y; DiPasco P; Al-Kasspooles M; Hoover A
J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jul; 27(7):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 36973500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of thoracic versus cervical anastomosis on anastomotic leak among patients who undergo esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
Chidi AP; Etchill EW; Ha JS; Bush EL; Yang SC; Battafarano RJ; Broderick SR
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Oct; 160(4):1088-1095. PubMed ID: 32299695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Laparoscopic Gastric Ischemic Preconditioning Prior to Esophagectomy on Anastomotic Stricture Rate and Comparison with Esophagectomy-Alone Controls.
Stuart CM; Mott NM; Dyas AR; Byers S; Gergen AK; Mungo B; Stewart CL; McCarter MD; Randhawa SK; David EA; Mitchell JD; Meguid RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jul; 31(7):4261-4270. PubMed ID: 38413507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy.
Juloori A; Tucker SL; Komaki R; Liao Z; Correa AM; Swisher SG; Hofstetter WL; Lin SH
J Thorac Oncol; 2014 Apr; 9(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 24736077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-embedded cervical circular stapled anastomosis in esophagectomy.
Li J; Wang B; Liang T; Guo NN; Zhao M
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Mar; 11(3):723-727. PubMed ID: 32017456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation to the Gastric Fundus Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy.
Goense L; van Rossum PSN; Ruurda JP; van Vulpen M; Mook S; Meijer GJ; van Hillegersberg R
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Dec; 102(6):1798-1804. PubMed ID: 27765168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A New Esophagogastric Anastomosis for McKeown Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer.
Yang G; Chen JK; Wang XB; Zhao JB; Jiang T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Apr; 113(4):e307-e310. PubMed ID: 34270974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Minimally Invasive Intrathoracic Hand-sewn Esophago-gastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Charalabopoulos A; Davakis S; Sakarellos P; Mpaili E; Sarlani E; Sakellariou S; Ziogas D; Theochari M; Liakakos T
Anticancer Res; 2023 Jun; 43(6):2749-2755. PubMed ID: 37247891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative analysis of mechanical and manual cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].
Cayi R; Li M; Xiong G; Cai K; Wang W
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 Jun; 32(6):908-9. PubMed ID: 22699083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.
Honkoop P; Siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Stassen LP; Hop WC; van Blankenstein M
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. PubMed ID: 8642814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy may increase the risk of severe anastomotic complications after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.
Klevebro F; Friesland S; Hedman M; Tsai JA; Lindblad M; Rouvelas I; Lundell L; Nilsson M
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2016 May; 401(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 27020672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
