These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465233)

  • 21. [Comparative study of the intermaxillary angle, the interincisive angle and the ANB angle in a reported group of the Portuguese population, referred for orthodontic treatment].
    da Cruz JP
    Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac; 1980; 22(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 7348330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Determining the sagittal relationship between the maxilla and the mandible: a cephalometric analysis to clear up the confusion.
    Davis GS; Cannon JL; Messersmith ML
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(1):22-8; quiz 29-30. PubMed ID: 23909085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relation of the SNA angle to the NSAr angle in excellent occlusion and in malocclusion.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 6960712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Zamora N; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2013 Jul; 18(4):e725-32. PubMed ID: 23722136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients.
    McNamara JA; Bookstein FL; Shaughnessy TG
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Aug; 88(2):91-110. PubMed ID: 3861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 May; 42(5):295-305. PubMed ID: 6585502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 9431467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia GM
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Feb; 2(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 10534977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
    Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.
    Mermigos J; Full CA; Andreasen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Jul; 98(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 2363406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation.
    Knösel M; Jung K; Attin T; Engelke W; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Gripp-Rudolph L; Attin R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):454-61. PubMed ID: 19413389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Measurement of maxillary and mandibular area on roentgenocephalograms. Comparisons between skeletal Class I, II and III (author's transl)].
    Sakai T; Ito Y; Takeshita S; Yamada K
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Sep; 39(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 6935320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric norms for the Chinese: a compilation of existing data.
    Moate SJ; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2002 Mar; 18(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 12502125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Statistical evaluation of the "measure of concordance" between Angle classifications and the ANB angle].
    Antonini A; Marchi M; Di Tante M; Zanobetti A
    Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 2637407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cephalometric norms of Nigerian children.
    Ajayi EO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):653-6. PubMed ID: 16286214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Age and skeletal type-related changes of some cephalometric parameters in Finnish girls.
    Haavikko K; Rahkamo A
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):283-9. PubMed ID: 2792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.