These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465233)

  • 61. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements.
    Braun S; Bantleon HP; Hnat WP; Freudenthaler JW; Marcotte MR; Johnson BE
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8526297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Relation of the SNA angle to the saddle angle.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Dec; 78(6):670-3. PubMed ID: 6935966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Selected cephalometric angular norms in Kikuyu children.
    Kapila S
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 2729667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Morphologic study of the mandibular fossa and the eminence of the temporomandibular joint in relation to the facial structures.
    Ikai A; Sugisaki M; Young-Sung K; Tanabe H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):634-8. PubMed ID: 9423695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):75-81. PubMed ID: 30427496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Polish face in profile: a cephalometric baseline study.
    Loster JE; Williams S; Wieczorek A; Loster BW
    Head Face Med; 2015 Mar; 11():5. PubMed ID: 25879745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The mechanical advantage of the masseter muscle in subjects with different vertical and sagittal facial morphology.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Sartori M; Ciusa V
    Clin Orthod Res; 1999 Aug; 2(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 10534991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns.
    Segner D
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Aug; 11(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 2676569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Overjet as a predictor of sagittal skeletal relationships.
    Zupancic S; Pohar M; Farcnik F; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 18540015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malocclusion.
    Buschang PH; Tanguay R; Turkewicz J; Demirjian A; La Palme L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 3465237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar heights of French-Canadians 10 to 15 years of age.
    Buschang PH; Carrillo R; Liu SS; Demirjian A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Evaluation of dentoalveolar compensation in skeletal class II malocclusion in a Pakistani University Hospital setting.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Jan; 19(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19149973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Does the Eastman correction over- or under-adjust ANB for positional changes of N?
    Kamaluddin JM; Cobourne MT; Sherriff M; Bister D
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 21926313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Cephalometric values for adult Mexican-Americans.
    Swlerenga D; Oesterle LJ; Messersmith ML
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 8059750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for African Americans.
    Faustini MM; Hale C; Cisneros GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 9107376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.