These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465236)

  • 1. Scattered radiation grids in cephalometric radiography.
    Price C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):431-6. PubMed ID: 3465236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    McNicol A; Stirrups DR
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scatter radiation in cephalometric radiography: the effects of grid and collimation.
    Tsuji Y; Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):278-82. PubMed ID: 16798926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic grids for electrostatic imaging systems.
    Muntz EP; Jacobson G; Kaegi EM; Klein DJ
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):197-204. PubMed ID: 959539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, Part 2: Image quality.
    Forsyth DB; Shaw WC; Richmond S; Roberts CT
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8678345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of low-dose digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Näslund EB; Kruger M; Petersson A; Hansen K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):136-9. PubMed ID: 9693525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography.
    Eppley BL; Sadove AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Oct; 49(10):1038-43. PubMed ID: 1890516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography.
    Fatouros PP; Gibbs SJ; Skubic SE; Rao GU
    Angle Orthod; 1984 Jan; 54(1):36-54. PubMed ID: 6584050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of conventional and rare earth screen-film systems for cephalometric radiographs.
    Kaugars GE; Fatouros P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):322-5. PubMed ID: 6950349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Possibilities of dose reduction in lateral cephalometric radiographs and its effects on clinical diagnostics.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jan; 36(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17329587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system.
    Seki K; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 8299830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of antiscatter grids in digital radiography. A phantom study.
    Shaw CC; Wang T; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Jun; 29(6):636-42. PubMed ID: 8088973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faster screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
    Hurlburt CE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Dec; 52(6):661-5. PubMed ID: 6947192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.