These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465236)

  • 21. Exposure reduction and image quality in orthodontic radiology: a review of the literature.
    Taylor TS; Ackerman RJ; Hardman PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Jan; 93(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 3276147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) for lateral cephalometric radiography: a technical report.
    Hoogeveen RC; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(1):20130203. PubMed ID: 24170799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. At what resolution should I scan cephalometric radiographs?
    Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):118-9. PubMed ID: 14718889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Grid versus air gap. A comparison of cephalometric techniques.
    Benson BW; Frederiksen NL; Goaz PW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 8108105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Utility of lead thyroid collar in cephalometric radiography.
    Choudhary AB; Motwani MB; Banode PJ; Chaudhary MB; Degwekar SS; Bhowate RR; Chaudhary SM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):698-9. PubMed ID: 23422634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
    D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exposure reduction in cephalometric radiology: a comprehensive approach.
    Tyndall DA; Matteson SR; Soltmann RE; Hamilton TL; Proffit WR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 May; 93(5):400-12. PubMed ID: 3163219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Perceptibility of details in conventional and digital teleradiography--a comparative study].
    Ruppenthal T; Doll G; Sergl HG; Fricke B
    Orthod Fr; 1991; 62 Pt 3():1033-42. PubMed ID: 1842243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic image quality and dose reduction using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8181645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evaluation of high-speed screen/film combinations in cephalometric radiography.
    Kimura K; Langland OE; Biggerstaff RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Dec; 92(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 3479894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Normal radiographic anatomy and common anomalies seen in cephalometric films.
    Kantor ML; Norton LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 May; 91(5):414-26. PubMed ID: 3554978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Physical and clinical evaluation of new high-strip-density radiographic grids.
    Doi K; Frank PH; Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; Makino S; Iida N; Carlin M
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 6340160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precision of measurements on conventional negative 'bones white' and inverted greyscale 'bones black' digital lateral cephalograms.
    Borrie F; Thomson D; McIntyre GT
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 21300728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image corrected cephalometric analysis (ICCA): design and evaluation.
    Spolyar JL; Vasileff W; MacIntosh RB
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1993 Nov; 30(6):528-39; discussion 539-41. PubMed ID: 8280730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
    Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical note: a comparison of antiscatter grids for digital radiography.
    Court L; Yamazaki T
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Nov; 77(923):950-2. PubMed ID: 15507421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) in orthodontic lateral cephalography.
    Hoogeveen RC; Guicherit PJ; Gopie SR; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(3):20130396. PubMed ID: 24720607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A dual sensitivity screen system for TMJ image enhancement in cephalometric radiography: sensitometric evaluation.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K; Scarfe WC; Braun S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Aug; 24(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 8617394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.