BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465369)

  • 1. The treatment of bimaxillary protrusion. A cephalometric consideration of changes in the inter-incisal angle and soft tissue profile.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1986 Oct; 13(4):209-20. PubMed ID: 3465369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment.
    Yogosawa F
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 2389852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue changes associated with first premolar extractions in adult females.
    Kachiwala VA; Kalha AS; Machado G
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 19634460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Profile changes following orthodontic correction of bimaxillary protrusion with a preadjusted edgewise appliance.
    Tan TJ
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 9456627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class I malocclusion with severe bimaxillary protrusion: a successful result.
    Bellamine M; Bentahar Z; El Quars F
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2013 Dec; 36(144):49-55. PubMed ID: 24624644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.
    Germeç D; Taner TU
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):539-49. PubMed ID: 18405818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with four premolars extracted.
    Bravo LA
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 8172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Post-orthodontic cephalometric variations in bimaxillary protrusion cases managed by premolar extraction - A retrospective study.
    Alqahtani ND; Alshammari R; Almoammar K; Almosa N; Almahdy A; Albarakati SF
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1530-1538. PubMed ID: 31719274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Jaw forms in the post-treatment and post-retention of pseudo-Class III mandibular protrusion in the permanent dentition as compared with those of true Class III mandibular protrusion].
    Yamada W
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1985 Dec; 11(4):284-302. PubMed ID: 3869274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bimaxillary protrusion in the Caucasian: a cephalometric study of the morphological features.
    Keating PJ
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 12(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 3863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft tissue profile changes associated with orthognathic surgery for bimaxillary protrusion.
    Nadkarni PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Nov; 44(11):851-4. PubMed ID: 3464710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion in adults with the Begg appliance.
    Lew K
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Nov; 11(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 2591485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lip curve changes in males with premolar extraction or nonextraction treatment.
    Lin PT; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):71-86. PubMed ID: 16429877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new approach to cephalometric analysis of the dental base relationship.
    Johnson JS
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 272128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions.
    Erdinc AE; Nanda RS; Dandajena TC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 17826600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class III surgical-orthodontic treatment: a cephalometric study.
    Johnston C; Burden D; Kennedy D; Harradine N; Stevenson M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):300-9. PubMed ID: 16979487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Profile changes following orthodontic treatment of class I bimaxillary protrusion in adult patients of Dravidian ethnicity: A prospective study.
    Sundareswaran S; Vijayan R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(5):530-537. PubMed ID: 29072216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars.
    Janson G; Fuziy A; de Freitas MR; Castanha Henriques JF; de Almeida RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):729.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18068588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.