These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34655089)

  • 1. Measurement errors in control risk regression: A comparison of correction techniques.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2022 Jan; 41(1):163-179. PubMed ID: 34655089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A double SIMEX approach for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Guolo A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 28077079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SIMEX approach to measurement error correction in meta-analysis with baseline risk as covariate.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2062-76. PubMed ID: 24339017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving likelihood-based inference in control rate regression.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28975682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A SIMEX approach for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with attention to ROC curves.
    Guolo A; Pesantez Cabrera TE
    Int J Biostat; 2023 Nov; 19(2):455-471. PubMed ID: 36288630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Discriminant Function Approach to Adjust for Processing and Measurement Error When a Biomarker is Assayed in Pooled Samples.
    Lyles RH; Van Domelen D; Mitchell EM; Schisterman EF
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Nov; 12(11):14723-40. PubMed ID: 26593934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correcting for Measurement Error in Time-Varying Covariates in Marginal Structural Models.
    Kyle RP; Moodie EE; Klein MB; Abrahamowicz M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 184(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 27416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approximate profile likelihood estimation for Cox regression with covariate measurement error.
    Cao Z; Wong MY
    Stat Med; 2022 Feb; 41(5):910-931. PubMed ID: 35067954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of an overall standardized mean difference in random-effects meta-analysis if the distribution of random effects departs from normal.
    Rubio-Aparicio M; López-López JA; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Viechtbauer W; Van den Noortgate W
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):489-503. PubMed ID: 29989344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Jackson D; Bowden J; Veroniki AA; Kontopantelis E; Viechtbauer W; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 30067315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexibly modeling the baseline risk in meta-analysis.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 22807131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bartlett-type corrections and bootstrap adjustments of likelihood-based inference methods for network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Nagashima K; Maruo K; Gosho M; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29250816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The number of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of intervention effects in meta-analysis--a simulation study.
    Thorlund K; Imberger G; Walsh M; Chu R; Gluud C; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Devereaux PJ; Thabane L
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(10):e25491. PubMed ID: 22028777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Considerations for analysis of time-to-event outcomes measured with error: Bias and correction with SIMEX.
    Oh EJ; Shepherd BE; Lumley T; Shaw PA
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1276-1289. PubMed ID: 29193180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating Measurement Error from Modeled Air Pollution Exposures into Epidemiological Analyses.
    Samoli E; Butland BK
    Curr Environ Health Rep; 2017 Dec; 4(4):472-480. PubMed ID: 28983855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Higher-order likelihood inference in meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Guolo A
    Stat Med; 2012 Feb; 31(4):313-27. PubMed ID: 22173666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A doubly robust estimator for the average treatment effect in the context of a mean-reverting measurement error.
    Lenis D; Ebnesajjad CF; Stuart EA
    Biostatistics; 2017 Apr; 18(2):325-337. PubMed ID: 27993763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.