116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34655231)
1. Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among public and private services in Brazil.
Bispo Pereira EH; Camilo-Júnior DJ; D'ávilla SCGP; Mattar NJ; Xavier-Júnior JCC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Aug; 158(2):289-294. PubMed ID: 34655231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cytology results among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Brazil.
Bispo Pereira EH; Camilo-Júnior DJ; Correa Garcia Pires D'ávilla S; Xavier-Júnior JC
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Mar; 282():161-167. PubMed ID: 36739667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
Longatto-Filho A; Levi JE; Martins TR; Cohen D; Cury L; Villa LL; Eluf-Neto J
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 26279162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of 1,030,482 Cervical Smear Results in Brazilian Population.
Campaner AB; Fernandes GL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Mar; 24(3):867-872. PubMed ID: 36974539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Silent High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Atypical Smears from Liquid Based Cervical Cytology - Three Years Experience in Thammasat University Hospital.
Lertvutivivat S; Chanthasenanont A; Chanthasenanont A; Muangto T; Nanthakomon T; Pongrojpaw D; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4353-4356. PubMed ID: 27797243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients with negative cervical biopsies after papanicolaou test interpretations of "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion": comparative longitudinal follow-up.
Huitron S; Bonvicino A; Fadare O
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2008 Jun; 12(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 18486894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frequency of high-grade squamous cervical lesions among women over age 65 years living with HIV.
Massad LS; Xie X; Minkoff HL; Michel KG; D'Souza G; Wang CC; Konkle-Parker D; Ofotokun I; Fischl MA; Rahangdale L; Strickler HD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):411.e1-411.e7. PubMed ID: 33957115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflex Human Papillomavirus Test Results as an Option for the Management of Korean Women With Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion.
Ryu KJ; Lee S; Min KJ; Kim JW; Hong JH; Song JY; Lee JK; Lee NW
Oncologist; 2015 Jun; 20(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 25964305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atypical Squamous Cells: Cytopathological Findings and Correlation with HPV Genotype and Histopathology.
Oliveira GG; Oliveira JMDSC; Eleutério RMN; Barbosa RCC; Almeida PRC; Eleutério J
Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):386-392. PubMed ID: 29898441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of implementing cytology-based cervical cancer screening national program in Lebanon: A pilot study.
Seoud M; Jaafar I; Hamadeh R; Ammar W; Atallah D; El-Kak F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 36183305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection in women 50 years and older with squamous cell papanicolaou test abnormalities.
Zhao C; Zhao S; Heider A; Austin RM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20670132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Histopathology of Women with “Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion” (ASC-H) Smears.
Ratree S; Kleebkaow P; Aue-Aungkul A; Temtanakitpaisan A; Chumworathayi B; Luanratanakorn S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Mar; 20(3):683-686. PubMed ID: 30909664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Underlying pathology of women with "atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" smears, in a region with a high incidence of cervical cancer.
Kietpeerakool C; Srisomboon J; Tantipalakorn C; Suprasert P; Khunamornpong S; Nimmanhaeminda K; Siriaunkgul S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2008 Apr; 34(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18412783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristic findings of cervical Papanicolaou tests from transgender patients on androgen therapy: Challenges in detecting dysplasia.
Adkins BD; Barlow AB; Jack A; Schultenover SJ; Desouki MM; Coogan AC; Weiss VL
Cytopathology; 2018 Jun; 29(3):281-287. PubMed ID: 29488269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applicability of On-Site Evaluation of Cervical Cytology Smears Stained with Toluidine Blue to Reduce Unsatisfactory Results.
Tummidi S; Shankaralingappa A; Sharmila V
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 36215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
