175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34655410)
1. Frozen-Permanent Section Discrepancy Rate in Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Serinelli S; Bryant SM; Williams MPA; Marzouk M; Zaccarini DJ
Head Neck Pathol; 2022 Jun; 16(2):466-475. PubMed ID: 34655410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frozen Section Evaluation of Margin Status in Primary Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: A Correlation Study of Frozen Section and Final Diagnoses.
Layfield EM; Schmidt RL; Esebua M; Layfield LJ
Head Neck Pathol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):175-180. PubMed ID: 28836224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Intraoperative Frozen Section to Assess Final Tumor Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Long SM; Mclean T; Valero Mayor C; Fitzgerald CWR; Feit NZ; Katabi N; Xu B; Cohen MA; Ganly I; Ghossein RA; Patel SG
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Oct; 148(10):911-917. PubMed ID: 35925571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of Intraoperative Frozen Section Controls With Improved Margin Assessment During Transoral Robotic Surgery for Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Yu AC; Afework DD; Goldstein JD; Abemayor E; Mendelsohn AH
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2022 Nov; 148(11):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36136328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of frozen section margins in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.
Chambers KJ; Kraft S; Emerick K
Laryngoscope; 2015 Mar; 125(3):636-9. PubMed ID: 25230253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection.
Du E; Ow TJ; Lo YT; Gersten A; Schiff BA; Tassler AB; Smith RV
Laryngoscope; 2016 Aug; 126(8):1768-75. PubMed ID: 27113207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for margin evaluation of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Ali JP; Mallick BA; Rashid K; Malik UA; Hashmi AA; Zia S; Irfan M; Khan A; Faridi N
BMC Res Notes; 2024 Feb; 17(1):43. PubMed ID: 38303028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancies in frozen section mucosal margin tissue in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Cooley ML; Hoffman HT; Robinson RA
Head Neck; 2002 Mar; 24(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 11891958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of Frozen Section Examination in Oral Cavity Cancers.
Demir B; Incaz S; Uckuyulu EI; Oysu C
Ear Nose Throat J; 2022 Sep; 101(8):NP354-NP357. PubMed ID: 33155855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frozen section analysis of margins for head and neck tumor resections: reduction of sampling errors with a third histologic level.
Olson SM; Hussaini M; Lewis JS
Mod Pathol; 2011 May; 24(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 21217647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gross examination by the surgeon as an alternative to frozen section for assessment of adequacy of surgical margin in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Chaturvedi P; Datta S; Nair S; Nair D; Pawar P; Vaishampayan S; Patil A; Kane S
Head Neck; 2014 Apr; 36(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 23765548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Specimen oriented intraoperative margin assessment in oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Horwich P; MacKay C; Bullock M; Taylor SM; Hart R; Trites J; Geldenhuys L; Williams B; Rigby MH
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Jun; 50(1):37. PubMed ID: 34154663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of Main Specimen and Tumor Bed Margin Status With Local Recurrence and Survival in Oral Cancer Surgery.
Buchakjian MR; Tasche KK; Robinson RA; Pagedar NA; Sperry SM
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Dec; 142(12):1191-1198. PubMed ID: 27423460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Independent Predictors of Prognosis Based on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma Surgical Margins.
Buchakjian MR; Ginader T; Tasche KK; Pagedar NA; Smith BJ; Sperry SM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Oct; 159(4):675-682. PubMed ID: 29737907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of intraoperative frozen section analysis on final resection margin status, recurrence, and patient outcome with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Nentwig K; Unterhuber T; Wolff KD; Ritschl LM; Nieberler M
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Dec; 25(12):6769-6777. PubMed ID: 33956217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frozen Section Evaluation for Surgical Margins in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Is it a Reliable Method for Partial and Total Laryngectomies?
Sivrice ME; Akın V; Erkılınç G; Yasan H; Tüz M; Okur E; Kumbul YÇ; Çiriş İM
Head Neck Pathol; 2023 Mar; 17(1):172-177. PubMed ID: 36171534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paradigm Change for Intraoperative Surgical Margin Assessment for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Tessler I; Marilena V; Alon EE; Gecel NA; Remer E; Gluck I; Yoffe T; Dobriyan A
Laryngoscope; 2024 Apr; 134(4):1725-1732. PubMed ID: 37929854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative evaluation of the resected bone margin in mandibular cancers using a trephine drill and frozen section analysis.
Hegde P; Gunishetty V; Shetty V; Shetty U; Abraham S; Bajjuri S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 52(4):409-412. PubMed ID: 35981925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Head and Neck Cancer: A Case of Misuse and Abuse?
Kubik MW; Sridharan S; Varvares MA; Zandberg DP; Skinner HD; Seethala RR; Chiosea SI
Head Neck Pathol; 2020 Jun; 14(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 32124417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoperative Use of Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography to Evaluate Tissue Microstructure in the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx.
Badhey AK; Schwarz JS; Laitman BM; Veremis BM; Westra WH; Yao M; Teng MS; Genden EM; Miles BA
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jan; 149(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 36454583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
