165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34655816)
1. Efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance while wearing a powered air-purifying respirator.
Chong JY; Kang C; Jeong W; Park JS; You Y; Ahn HJ; Min JH; Hwang T; Kwon O; Kim SW
Am J Emerg Med; 2022 Jan; 51():22-25. PubMed ID: 34655816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A 10-s rest improves chest compression quality during hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
Min MK; Yeom SR; Ryu JH; Kim YI; Park MR; Han SK; Lee SH; Cho SJ
Resuscitation; 2013 Sep; 84(9):1279-84. PubMed ID: 23402967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Chest Compressions Metrics Measured Using the Laerdal Skill Reporter and Q-CPR: A Simulation Study.
Davey P; Whatman C; Dicker B
Simul Healthc; 2015 Oct; 10(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 26426556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The protective effect of tight-fitting powered air-purifying respirators during chest compressions.
Goto Y; Jingushi N; Hiraiwa H; Ogawa H; Sakai Y; Kasugai D; Tanaka T; Higashi M; Yamamoto T; Numaguchi A
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Nov; 49():172-177. PubMed ID: 34118785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bystander fatigue and CPR quality by older bystanders: a randomized crossover trial comparing continuous chest compressions and 30:2 compressions to ventilations.
Liu S; Vaillancourt C; Kasaboski A; Taljaard M
CJEM; 2016 Nov; 18(6):461-468. PubMed ID: 27650514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Manual versus Mechanical Chest Compressions on Surfaces of Varying Softness with or without Backboards: A Randomized, Crossover Manikin Study.
Putzer G; Fiala A; Braun P; Neururer S; Biechl K; Keilig B; Ploner W; Fop E; Paal P
J Emerg Med; 2016 Apr; 50(4):594-600.e1. PubMed ID: 26607696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Objective assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of 10-11-year-old schoolchildren using two different external chest compression to ventilation ratios.
Hill K; Mohan C; Stevenson M; McCluskey D
Resuscitation; 2009 Jan; 80(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 18952356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal chest compression rate in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective, randomized crossover study using a manikin model.
Lee SH; Ryu JH; Min MK; Kim YI; Park MR; Yeom SR; Han SK; Park SW
Eur J Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):253-257. PubMed ID: 25710082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Simulation Study Using a Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Medical Manikin to Evaluate the Effects of Using Personal Protective Equipment on Performance of Emergency Resuscitation by Medical Students from the University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland and Non-Medical Personnel.
Starosolski M; Zysiak-Christ B; Kalemba A; Kapłan C; Ulbrich K
Med Sci Monit; 2022 Jul; 28():e936844. PubMed ID: 35778812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of simplified chest compression-only CPR training for the general public: a randomized controlled trial.
Nishiyama C; Iwami T; Kawamura T; Ando M; Yonemoto N; Hiraide A; Nonogi H
Resuscitation; 2008 Oct; 79(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 18656300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chest compression quality comparing 1-min vs 2-min rotation of rescuers wearing N95 masks.
Mathew MJ; Kundra P; Vinayagam S
Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Feb; 76():75-81. PubMed ID: 38006635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External chest compressions using a mechanical feedback device : cross-over simulation study.
Skorning M; Derwall M; Brokmann JC; Rörtgen D; Bergrath S; Pflipsen J; Beuerlein S; Rossaint R; Beckers SK
Anaesthesist; 2011 Aug; 60(8):717-22. PubMed ID: 21437754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compressing with dominant hand improves quality of manual chest compressions for rescuers who performed suboptimal CPR in manikins.
Wang J; Tang C; Zhang L; Gong Y; Yin C; Li Y
Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Jul; 33(7):931-6. PubMed ID: 25937378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Heidenreich JW; Berg RA; Higdon TA; Ewy GA; Kern KB; Sanders AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17015418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of finger-marker for maintaining the correct compression point during paediatric resuscitation: A simulation study.
Jung JY; Kwak YH; Kwon H; Choi YJ; Kim DK; Kim HC; Lee JC; Park JH; Lim H
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1303-1308. PubMed ID: 28483276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How effective are chest compressions when wearing mask? A randomised simulation study among first-year health care students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Bánfai B; Musch J; Betlehem J; Sánta E; Horváth B; Németh D; Bánfai-Csonka H
BMC Emerg Med; 2022 May; 22(1):82. PubMed ID: 35527256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CPR PRO® device reduces rescuer fatigue during continuous chest compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover trial using a manikin model.
Kovic I; Lulic D; Lulic I
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 23845522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quality of lay person CPR performance with compression: ventilation ratios 15:2, 30:2 or continuous chest compressions without ventilations on manikins.
Odegaard S; Saether E; Steen PA; Wik L
Resuscitation; 2006 Dec; 71(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 17069958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Push as hard as you can" instruction for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized simulation study.
van Tulder R; Roth D; Havel C; Eisenburger P; Heidinger B; Chwojka CC; Novosad H; Sterz F; Herkner H; Schreiber W
J Emerg Med; 2014 Mar; 46(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 24238592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
