BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34655862)

  • 1. Use of prophylactic pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in the US: A review of adherence to present guidelines for usage.
    Crawford J; Moore DC; Morrison VA; Dale D
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 29():100466. PubMed ID: 34655862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two decades of pegfilgrastim: what have we learned? Where do we go from here?
    De Oliveira Brandao C; Lewis S; Sandschafer D; Crawford J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2023 May; 39(5):707-718. PubMed ID: 36976784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prophylactic pegfilgrastim to prevent febrile neutropenia among patients receiving biweekly (Q2W) chemotherapy regimens: a systematic review of efficacy, effectiveness and safety.
    Mahtani R; Crawford J; Flannery SM; Lawrence T; Schenfeld J; Gawade PL
    BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):621. PubMed ID: 34044798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.
    Weycker D; Doroff R; Hanau A; Bowers C; Belani R; Chandler D; Lonshteyn A; Bensink M; Lyman GH
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):792. PubMed ID: 31399079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Refining the role of pegfilgrastim (a long-acting G-CSF) for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: consensus guidance recommendations.
    Aapro M; Boccia R; Leonard R; Camps C; Campone M; Choquet S; Danova M; Glaspy J; Hus I; Link H; Sliwa T; Tesch H; Valero V
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3295-3304. PubMed ID: 28842778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Overuse and underuse of pegfilgrastim for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia.
    Zullo AR; Lou U; Cabral SE; Huynh J; Berard-Collins CM
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2019 Sep; 25(6):1357-1365. PubMed ID: 30124123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and Efficacy of Pegfilgrastim When Given Less Than 14 Days Before the Next Chemotherapy Cycle: Review of Every 14-Day Chemotherapy Regimen Containing 5-FU Continuous Infusion.
    Donkor KN; Selim JH; Waworuntu A; Lewis K
    Ann Pharmacother; 2017 Oct; 51(10):840-847. PubMed ID: 28597691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours.
    Aapro MS; Bohlius J; Cameron DA; Dal Lago L; Donnelly JP; Kearney N; Lyman GH; Pettengell R; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Walewski J; Weber DC; Zielinski C;
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 Jan; 47(1):8-32. PubMed ID: 21095116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.
    Salmon JP; Smakal M; Karanikiotis C; Wojtukiewicz MZ; Omnes Y; DeCosta L; Wetten S; O'Kelly J
    Support Care Cancer; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 30259136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors to prevent febrile neutropenia and related complications in cancer patients in clinical practice: A systematic review.
    Mitchell S; Li X; Woods M; Garcia J; Hebard-Massey K; Barron R; Samuel M
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2016 Oct; 22(5):702-16. PubMed ID: 26769697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective study to evaluate febrile neutropenia incidence in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector vs other choices.
    Rifkin RM; Crawford J; Mahtani RL; Dale DC; Narang M; MacLaughlin WW; Huynh C; Gawade PL; Lewis S; DeCosta L; Lawrence T; Belani R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Oct; 30(10):7913-7922. PubMed ID: 35732748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis: does timing of administration matter?
    Weycker D; Li X; Figueredo J; Barron R; Tzivelekis S; Hagiwara M
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 May; 24(5):2309-2316. PubMed ID: 26607482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pegfilgrastim and daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: patterns of use and neutropenia-related outcomes in cancer patients in Spain--results of the LEARN Study.
    Almenar D; Mayans J; Juan O; Bueno JM; Lopez JI; Frau A; Guinot M; Cerezuela P; Buscalla EG; Gasquet JA; Sanchez J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 May; 18(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19076208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients receiving pegfilgrastim on-body injector versus other options for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia: breast cancer subgroup analysis.
    Mahtani RL; Belani R; Crawford J; Dale D; DeCosta L; Gawade PL; Huynh C; Lawrence T; Lewis S; MacLaughlin WW; Narang M; Rifkin R
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6135-6144. PubMed ID: 35426046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The economic value of primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim compared with filgrastim in patients with breast cancer in the UK.
    Liu Z; Doan QV; Malin J; Leonard R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2009; 7(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 19799473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biosimilar Pegfilgrastim: Improving Access and Optimising Practice to Supportive Care that Enables Cure.
    Cornes P; Gascon P; Vulto AG; Aapro M
    BioDrugs; 2020 Jun; 34(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 32232676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of hospitalization risk and associated costs among patients receiving sargramostim, filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Heaney ML; Toy EL; Vekeman F; Laliberté F; Dority BL; Perlman D; Barghout V; Duh MS
    Cancer; 2009 Oct; 115(20):4839-48. PubMed ID: 19637341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.