These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34656014)

  • 1. Algorithms and methods for computerized analysis of mammography images in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Hernández A; Miranda DA; Pertuz S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Nov; 212():106443. PubMed ID: 34656014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Zheng Y; Keller BM; Ray S; Wang Y; Conant EF; Gee JC; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4149-60. PubMed ID: 26133615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns on a large clinical dataset of full-field digital mammograms: robustness study with two high-risk datasets.
    Li H; Giger ML; Lan L; Bancroft Brown J; MacMahon A; Mussman M; Olopade OI; Sennett C
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 22246204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts.
    Pérez-Benito FJ; Signol F; Pérez-Cortés JC; Pollán M; Pérez-Gómez B; Salas-Trejo D; Casals M; Martínez I; LLobet R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():123-132. PubMed ID: 31319940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Mammographic Systems Affect the Performance of Computerized Parenchymal Analysis?
    Pertuz S; Sassi A; Arponen O; Holli-Helenius K; Laaperi AL; Rinta-Kiikka I
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():4863-4866. PubMed ID: 31946950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond breast density: a review on the advancing role of parenchymal texture analysis in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Gastounioti A; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):91. PubMed ID: 27645219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
    Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field cancerization in the understanding of parenchymal analysis of mammograms for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Miranda DA; Pertuz S
    Med Hypotheses; 2020 Mar; 136():109511. PubMed ID: 31837523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.
    Keller BM; Nathan DL; Wang Y; Zheng Y; Gee JC; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4903-17. PubMed ID: 22894417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized detection of breast tissue asymmetry depicted on bilateral mammograms: a preliminary study of breast risk stratification.
    Wang X; Lederman D; Tan J; Wang XH; Zheng B
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1234-41. PubMed ID: 20619697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Lan L
    Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 17434064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image retrieval-based parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Padilla A; Arponen O; Rinta-Kiikka I; Pertuz S
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
    Arefan D; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31667873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms: a quantitative assessment.
    Tan M; Al-Shabi M; Chan WY; Thomas L; Rahmat K; Ng KH
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 33447988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a fully-automated parenchymal analysis software for breast cancer risk assessment: A pilot study in a Finnish sample.
    Pertuz S; Sassi A; Holli-Helenius K; Kämäräinen J; Rinta-Kiikka I; Lääperi AL; Arponen O
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108710. PubMed ID: 31689665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
    Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparison of Regions of Interest in Parenchymal Analysis for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Africano G; Arponen O; Sassi A; Karivaara-Makela M; Holli-Helenius K; Rinta-Kiikka I; Laaperi AL; Pertuz S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1136-1139. PubMed ID: 33018187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.
    Kontos D; Ikejimba LC; Bakic PR; Troxel AB; Conant EF; Maidment AD
    Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 21771961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.