These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34656014)

  • 21. Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks.
    Yi PH; Lin A; Wei J; Yu AC; Sair HI; Hui FK; Hager GD; Harvey SC
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31197559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Deep Learning Mammography-based Model for Improved Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Yala A; Lehman C; Schuster T; Portnoi T; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 31063083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Automatic Quantification of Breast Density from Mammography Using Deep Learning].
    Inoue K; Kawasaki A; Koshimizu K; Ariizumi C; Unno K; Nagashima M; Mizuno K; Misumi M; Tsutsumi C; Sasaki T; Doi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(10):1165-1172. PubMed ID: 34670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A novel deep learning architecture outperforming 'off‑the‑shelf' transfer learning and feature‑based methods in the automated assessment of mammographic breast density.
    Trivizakis E; Ioannidis GS; Melissianos VD; Papadakis GZ; Tsatsakis A; Spandidos DA; Marias K
    Oncol Rep; 2019 Nov; 42(5):2009-2015. PubMed ID: 31545461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.
    Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Chinander MR
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 18175183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of type of full-field digital image on mammographic density assessment and breast cancer risk estimation: a case-control study.
    Busana MC; Eng A; Denholm R; Dowsett M; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Sep; 18(1):96. PubMed ID: 27670914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of a Deep Learning Risk Score and Standard Mammographic Density Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Dembrower K; Liu Y; Azizpour H; Eklund M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Strand F
    Radiology; 2020 Feb; 294(2):265-272. PubMed ID: 31845842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence for Mammography.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1225-1239. PubMed ID: 33987993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
    Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Deep Learning in Mammography: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Multipurpose Image Analysis Software in the Detection of Breast Cancer.
    Becker AS; Marcon M; Ghafoor S; Wurnig MC; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Jul; 52(7):434-440. PubMed ID: 28212138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new near-term breast cancer risk prediction scheme based on the quantitative analysis of ipsilateral view mammograms.
    Sun W; Tseng TB; Qian W; Saltzstein EC; Zheng B; Yu H; Zhou S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():29-38. PubMed ID: 29512502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Kontos D; Winham SJ; Oustimov A; Pantalone L; Hsieh MK; Gastounioti A; Whaley DH; Hruska CB; Kerlikowske K; Brandt K; Conant EF; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 30375931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
    Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.
    Ray S; Chen L; Keller BM; Chen J; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):977-86. PubMed ID: 27236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation.
    Kallergi M; Lucier BJ; Berman CG; Hersh MR; Kim JJ; Szabunio MS; Clark RA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 16373759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.
    Geras KJ; Mann RM; Moy L
    Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):246-259. PubMed ID: 31549948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.
    Chen L; Ray S; Keller BM; Pertuz S; McDonald ES; Conant EF; Kontos D
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):693-700. PubMed ID: 27002418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.