179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34657619)
1. Laparoscopic nerve‑sparing radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Ma L; Li Q; Guo Y; Tan X; Wang M; Qi Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 19(1):301. PubMed ID: 34657619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.
Shi R; Wei W; Jiang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 26569055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.
Liang Z; Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 20673971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Bladder Function Recovery.
Liu Q; Li P; Sun Y; Zhang S; Liu K
J Invest Surg; 2020 Apr; 33(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 30380342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Duan D; Liu B; Li L
J BUON; 2020; 25(2):743-749. PubMed ID: 32521862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhang F; Song X
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Nov; 45(11):465-474. PubMed ID: 36256872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of modified radical laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open radical hysterectomy on short-term clinical outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial.
Lv X; Ding B; Xu J; Shen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):167. PubMed ID: 37270549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for bulky cervical cancer (≥6 cm) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
Yang Y; Qin T; Zhang W; Wu Q; Yang A; Xu F
Int J Surg; 2016 Oct; 34():35-40. PubMed ID: 27519498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Postsurgical urodynamic study of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer.
Terada S; Terai Y; Tanaka Y; Tanaka T; Tsunetoh S; Ohmichi M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2863-2871. PubMed ID: 35934761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
