These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3465772)

  • 1. Size of the alveolar arch of the mandible in relation to that of the maxilla in 45,X females.
    Laine T; Alvesalo L
    J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 65(12):1432-4. PubMed ID: 3465772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Establishment of normal value of posterior arch length of adolescence in Chengdu].
    Liu C; Cao Y; Zhao Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 21(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 12898765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
    Hesby RM; Marshall SD; Dawson DV; Southard KA; Casko JS; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions.
    Uysal T; Kurt G; Ramoglu SI
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Palatal dimensions in 45,X-females.
    Laine T; Alvesalo L; Lammi S
    J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1985; 5(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 4044787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental occlusion and arch size and shape in karyotype 46,XY females.
    Grön M; Alvesalo L
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 9239961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion.
    Sayin MO; Turkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 15264647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between dental arch width and vertical facial morphology in untreated adults.
    Forster CM; Sunga E; Chung CH
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 18263889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical bone thickness of the alveolar process measured with cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different facial types.
    Ozdemir F; Tozlu M; Germec-Cakan D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 23374925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Palatal height and dental arch dimensions in Turner syndrome karyotypes.
    Rizell S; Barrenäs ML; Andlin-Sobocki A; Stecksén-Blicks C; Kjellberg H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):841-7. PubMed ID: 23397057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.
    Park HS; Lee YJ; Jeong SH; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18174068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary and mandibular dentoalveolar heights of French-Canadians 10 to 15 years of age.
    Buschang PH; Carrillo R; Liu SS; Demirjian A
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18193960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the curve of Spee in the maxilla and mandible of human permanent healthy dentitions.
    Xu H; Suzuki T; Muronoi M; Ooya K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Dec; 92(6):536-9. PubMed ID: 15583558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphologic alterations of tooth crown in patients with Turner syndrome and its association with orthodontic anomalies].
    Szilágyi A; Keszthelyi G; Madléna M; Nagy G
    Fogorv Sz; 2000 Sep; 93(9):268-76. PubMed ID: 11057025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A longitudinal study on growth and development of dental arches of primary, mixed and permanent dentitions].
    Odajima T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Mar; 90(3):369-409. PubMed ID: 2135098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual variation in tooth-size/ arch-length changes from the primary to permanent dentitions.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16779973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chin development as a result of differential jaw growth.
    Marshall SD; Low LE; Holton NE; Franciscus RG; Frazier M; Qian F; Mann K; Schneider G; Scott JE; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):456-64. PubMed ID: 21457856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alveolar arch dimensions, orthodontic treatment and absence of permanent teeth among Finnish students. An epidemiologic study.
    Laine T; Hausen H
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Jul; 55(3):225-33, 249-50. PubMed ID: 3863503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2.
    Uysal T; Memili B; Usumez S; Sari Z
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):941-7. PubMed ID: 16448235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary versus mandibular arch form differences in human permanent dentition assessed by Euclidean-distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Arch Oral Biol; 1994 Feb; 39(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8185498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.