These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34657765)
41. Voluntary phantom hand and finger movements in transhumerai amputees could be used to naturally control polydigital prostheses. Jarrasse N; Nicol C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; De Graaf JB IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1239-1245. PubMed ID: 28813991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Discrete Action Control for Prosthetic Digits. Krasoulis A; Nazarpour K IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():610-620. PubMed ID: 35259109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Improved hand prostheses control for transradial amputees based on hybrid of voice recognition and electromyography. Alkhafaf OS; Wali MK; Al-Timemy AH Int J Artif Organs; 2021 Jul; 44(7):509-517. PubMed ID: 33287634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Age-Dependent Upper Limb Myoelectric Control Capability in Typically Developing Children. Gonzalez M; Su H; Fu Q IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1009-1018. PubMed ID: 35412985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees. Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ; J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand. Pasquina PF; Evangelista M; Carvalho AJ; Lockhart J; Griffin S; Nanos G; McKay P; Hansen M; Ipsen D; Vandersea J; Butkus J; Miller M; Murphy I; Hankin D J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 244():85-93. PubMed ID: 25102286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Outperforms Direct Control for Transhumeral Amputees with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Hargrove LJ; Miller LA; Turner K; Kuiken TA Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13840. PubMed ID: 29062019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Proposal of bioinstrumentation using shape deformation of amputated upper limb. Mori T; Tanaka Y; Yoshikawa K; Katane D; Torishima H; Shimizu Y; Hara Y Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():882-5. PubMed ID: 24109829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Understanding Limb Position and External Load Effects on Real-Time Pattern Recognition Control in Amputees. Teh Y; Hargrove LJ IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jul; 28(7):1605-1613. PubMed ID: 32396094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements. Krasoulis A; Kyranou I; Erden MS; Nazarpour K; Vijayakumar S J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 28697795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Transfemoral amputee recovery strategies following trips to their sound and prosthesis sides throughout swing phase. Shirota C; Simon AM; Kuiken TA J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Sep; 12():79. PubMed ID: 26353775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Myoelectric neural interface enables accurate control of a virtual multiple degree-of-freedom foot-ankle prosthesis. Tkach DC; Lipschutz RD; Finucane SB; Hargrove LJ IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650499. PubMed ID: 24187314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report. Monné Cuevas P; Borrás Correa A; Vidal Fortuny E; Ángeles Diaz Vela M; Calvo Sanz J Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jan; 16(1):112-118. PubMed ID: 31373523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Control within a virtual environment is correlated to functional outcomes when using a physical prosthesis. Hargrove L; Miller L; Turner K; Kuiken T J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(Suppl 1):60. PubMed ID: 30255800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Phantom-Mobility-Based Prosthesis Control in Transhumeral Amputees Without Surgical Reinnervation: A Preliminary Study. Jarrassé N; de Montalivet E; Richer F; Nicol C; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; de Graaf JB Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2018; 6():164. PubMed ID: 30555823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Simultaneous Control of 2DOF Upper-Limb Prosthesis With Body Compensations-Based Control: A Multiple Cases Study. Legrand M; Marchand C; Richer F; Touillet A; Martinet N; Paysant J; Morel G; Jarrasse N IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1745-1754. PubMed ID: 35749322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Resolving the adverse impact of mobility on myoelectric pattern recognition in upper-limb multifunctional prostheses. Samuel OW; Li X; Geng Y; Asogbon MG; Fang P; Huang Z; Li G Comput Biol Med; 2017 Nov; 90():76-87. PubMed ID: 28961473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Development of upper limb prostheses: current progress and areas for growth. González-Fernández M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jun; 95(6):1013-4. PubMed ID: 24361817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]