These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34657820)

  • 41. Reprocessing single-use devices--regulatory roles.
    Dunn D
    AORN J; 2002 Jul; 76(1):100-6, 108-12, 114 passim; quiz 129-32. PubMed ID: 12134397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Validation of instrument reprocessing methods for the Ipas manual vacuum aspiration devices.
    Powell B; Kapp N
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Oct; 147(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 31294825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Factors affecting implementation and pass rates of surgical instrument moistening.
    Huang Y; Huang Y; Chen Y; Pan W; Hu J; Yi L
    BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 21(1):752. PubMed ID: 34348685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.
    Shephard MD; Mazzachi BC; Watkinson L; Shephard AK; Laurence C; Gialamas A; Bubner T
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1189. PubMed ID: 19689171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Representative survey on the reprocessing of endodontic instruments in Germany.
    Sonntag D; Martin E; Raab WH
    Br Dent J; 2016 May; 220(9):465-9. PubMed ID: 27173705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Medical instrument reprocessing: current issues with cleaning and cleaning monitoring.
    Alfa MJ
    Am J Infect Control; 2019 Jun; 47S():A10-A16. PubMed ID: 31146843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Cleaning of instruments: an absolute requirement for successful reprocessing.
    Wilder JA; Roth K
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2012; Suppl():69-72. PubMed ID: 22559780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A pilot study comparing pattern of damage sustained among instruments from different surgical units in a tertiary care centre in Nepal - reappraising the role of instrument reprocessing in retaining their value.
    Munakomi S; Shah R; Shrestha S
    F1000Res; 2018; 7():102. PubMed ID: 30345016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Impact of water quality on reprocessing equipment: Assessment of neurosurgical instruments cleaning and biofilm formation in hospital pipes.
    Alvim ALS; Varoto AA; Martins E; Rigotti MA; Ferreira AM; Dodo NB; Diniz MO; Giroti ALB; Carneiro LM; Dos Santos Almeida Vaz E; de Sousa AFL; de Andrade D
    J Infect Prev; 2024 Sep; 25(5):161-165. PubMed ID: 39318723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Decontaminated single-use devices: an oxymoron that may be placing patients at risk for cross-contamination.
    Heeg P; Roth K; Reichl R; Cogdill CP; Bond WW
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Sep; 22(9):542-9. PubMed ID: 11732782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Infections and exposures: reported incidents associated with unsuccessful decontamination of reusable surgical instruments.
    Southworth PM
    J Hosp Infect; 2014 Nov; 88(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 25287950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. High-resolution tweezers for cutting and coagulation reprocessing.
    Zilberstein B; Silva RC; Valim SG; Yukui KT; Valentim R
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2013; 26(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Integrated procurement and reprocessing planning for reusable medical devices with a limited shelf life.
    Rickers S; Sahling F
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2024 Jun; 27(2):168-187. PubMed ID: 38270704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Improved surveillance of surgical instruments reprocessing following the variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease crisis in England: findings from a three-year survey.
    Hervé RC; Hedges J; Keevil CW
    J Hosp Infect; 2021 Apr; 110():15-25. PubMed ID: 33482297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections by Monitoring the Cleanliness of Medical Devices and Other Critical Points in a Sterilization Service.
    Veiga-Malta I
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2016 Apr; 50 Suppl 3():45-52. PubMed ID: 27100075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Uphill grime: process improvement in surgical instrument cleaning.
    Azizi J; Anderson SG; Murphy S; Pryce S
    AORN J; 2012 Aug; 96(2):152-62. PubMed ID: 22840504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey.
    Hooper DJ
    Clin Drug Investig; 2010; 30(11):749-63. PubMed ID: 20818837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effectiveness of Reprocessing for Flexible Bronchoscopes and Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopes.
    Ofstead CL; Quick MR; Wetzler HP; Eiland JE; Heymann OL; Sonetti DA; Ferguson JS
    Chest; 2018 Nov; 154(5):1024-1034. PubMed ID: 29859183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Design and implementation of the infection prevention program into risk management: Managing high level disinfection and sterilization in the outpatient setting.
    Sweet W; Snyder D; Raymond M
    J Healthc Risk Manag; 2020 Jul; 40(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 32367590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Cost analysis of reprocessing disposable forceps used in video-assisted surgery].
    Psaltikidis EM; Graziano KU; Frezatti F
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2006; 14(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 16967167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.