These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34657855)

  • 21. Comparative study of motor cortical excitability changes following anodal tDCS or high-frequency tRNS in relation to stimulation duration.
    Haeckert J; Lasser C; Pross B; Hasan A; Strube W
    Physiol Rep; 2020 Oct; 8(19):e14595. PubMed ID: 32996722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Wiethoff S; Hamada M; Rothwell JC
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 24630848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Failure of tDCS to modulate motor excitability and speech motor learning.
    Wiltshire CEE; Watkins KE
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107568. PubMed ID: 32687836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No robust online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability.
    Pillen S; Knodel N; Hermle D; Hanke M; Ziemann U; Bergmann TO
    Brain Stimul; 2022; 15(5):1254-1268. PubMed ID: 36084908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The association of motor imagery and kinesthetic illusion prolongs the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal tract excitability.
    Kaneko F; Shibata E; Hayami T; Nagahata K; Aoyama T
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 13():36. PubMed ID: 27079199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.
    Agboada D; Mosayebi Samani M; Jamil A; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18185. PubMed ID: 31796827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Voluntary movement reverses the effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on corticomotor excitability.
    Ataoglu EE; Caglayan HB; Cengiz B
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Sep; 235(9):2653-2659. PubMed ID: 28577024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Bergmann TO; Groppa S; Seeger M; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 102(4):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19692511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five anodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 24hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2019 Feb; 49(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 30635162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
    Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents.
    Moliadze V; Schmanke T; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on corticospinal excitability.
    Tsuiki S; Sasaki R; Miyaguchi S; Kojima S; Saito K; Inukai Y; Masaki M; Otsuru N; Onishi H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0214592. PubMed ID: 30925178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability.
    Vergallito A; Varoli E; Pisoni A; Mattavelli G; Del Mauro L; Feroldi S; Vallar G; Romero Lauro LJ
    Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120242. PubMed ID: 37348625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Different current intensities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation do not differentially modulate motor cortex plasticity.
    Kidgell DJ; Daly RM; Young K; Lum J; Tooley G; Jaberzadeh S; Zoghi M; Pearce AJ
    Neural Plast; 2013; 2013():603502. PubMed ID: 23577272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
    Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.
    Nitsche MA; Doemkes S; Karaköse T; Antal A; Liebetanz D; Lang N; Tergau F; Paulus W
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):3109-17. PubMed ID: 17251360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
    Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
    Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.
    Ambrus GG; Chaieb L; Stilling R; Rothkegel H; Antal A; Paulus W
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 616():98-104. PubMed ID: 26826607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.