These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34657855)

  • 41. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES).
    Bortoletto M; Rodella C; Salvador R; Miranda PC; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task.
    Ambrus GG; Chaieb L; Stilling R; Rothkegel H; Antal A; Paulus W
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 616():98-104. PubMed ID: 26826607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow.
    Rawji V; Ciocca M; Zacharia A; Soares D; Truong D; Bikson M; Rothwell J; Bestmann S
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(2):289-298. PubMed ID: 29146468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis.
    Nemanich ST; Lench DH; Sutter EN; Kowalski JL; Francis SM; Meekins GD; Krach LE; Feyma T; Gillick BT
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2023 Mar; 43():27-35. PubMed ID: 36878110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.
    Lang N; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Lemon RN
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 14745467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Motor cortex-induced plasticity by noninvasive brain stimulation: a comparison between transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Simis M; Adeyemo BO; Medeiros LF; Miraval F; Gagliardi RJ; Fregni F
    Neuroreport; 2013 Dec; 24(17):973-5. PubMed ID: 24100412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex.
    Kidgell DJ; Goodwill AM; Frazer AK; Daly RM
    BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 14():64. PubMed ID: 23815634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can genetic polymorphisms predict response variability to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex?
    Pellegrini M; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2021 Mar; 53(5):1569-1591. PubMed ID: 33048398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alters elbow flexor muscle recruitment strategies.
    Krishnan C; Ranganathan R; Kantak SS; Dhaher YY; Rymer WZ
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 24582369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Determination of anodal tDCS duration threshold for reversal of corticospinal excitability: An investigation for induction of counter-regulatory mechanisms.
    Hassanzahraee M; Nitsche MA; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(3):832-839. PubMed ID: 32289714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on motor evoked potentials variability in humans.
    Bashir S; Ahmad S; Alatefi M; Hamza A; Sharaf M; Fecteau S; Yoo WK
    Physiol Rep; 2019 Jul; 7(13):e14087. PubMed ID: 31301123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on I-wave activity in humans.
    Lang N; Nitsche MA; Dileone M; Mazzone P; De Andrés-Arés J; Diaz-Jara L; Paulus W; Di Lazzaro V; Oliviero A
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Jun; 105(6):2802-10. PubMed ID: 21430275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of electrode angle-orientation on the impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability.
    Foerster Á; Yavari F; Farnad L; Jamil A; Paulus W; Nitsche MA; Kuo MF
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(2):263-266. PubMed ID: 30389333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Efficacy of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is Related to Sensitivity to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Labruna L; Jamil A; Fresnoza S; Batsikadze G; Kuo MF; Vanderschelden B; Ivry RB; Nitsche MA
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 26493498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Aftereffects of 2 noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on corticospinal excitability in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study.
    Goh HT; Chan HY; Abdul-Latif L
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25427033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over the cerebellum differentially affect the cerebellum and primary motor cortex pathway.
    Kawakami S; Inukai Y; Ikarashi H; Watanabe H; Miyaguchi S; Otsuru N; Onishi H
    J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Jun; 100():59-65. PubMed ID: 35421743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The interaction with task-induced activity is more important than polarization: a tDCS study.
    Bortoletto M; Pellicciari MC; Rodella C; Miniussi C
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 25464828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.