These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34659416)

  • 1. Application of Fractal Analysis in Detecting Trabecular Bone Changes in Periapical Radiograph of Patients with Periodontitis.
    Soltani P; Sami S; Yaghini J; Golkar E; Riccitiello F; Spagnuolo G
    Int J Dent; 2021; 2021():3221448. PubMed ID: 34659416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of trabecular bone changes in patients with periodontitis using fractal analysis: A periapical radiography study.
    Aktuna Belgin C; Serindere G
    J Periodontol; 2020 Jul; 91(7):933-937. PubMed ID: 31850519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of Fractal Analysis for the Discrimination of Trabecular Changes Between Individuals With Healthy Gingiva or Moderate Periodontitis.
    Sener E; Cinarcik S; Baksi BG
    J Periodontol; 2015 Dec; 86(12):1364-9. PubMed ID: 26291294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fractal analysis of dental radiographs to detect periodontitis-induced trabecular changes.
    Updike SX; Nowzari H
    J Periodontal Res; 2008 Dec; 43(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 18624949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Image Resolution and Compression on Fractal Analysis of the Periapical Bone.
    Toghyani S; Nasseh I; Aoun G; Noujeim M
    Acta Inform Med; 2019 Sep; 27(3):167-170. PubMed ID: 31762572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of trabecular bone structure in individuals with healthy periodontium and stage III/IV, grade C periodontitis by fractal analysis.
    Korkmaz MZ; Altin A; Günaçar DN; Köse TE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Mar; 135(3):427-432. PubMed ID: 36328893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anatomical assessment of the trabecular structure of the alveolar bone in periodontal disease by fractal analysis method.
    Eser S; Sarıbaş E
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2024; 83(1):157-167. PubMed ID: 36967621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of type 2 diabetes mellitus on changes in the fractal dimension of periapical lesion in teeth after root canal treatment: a fractal analysis study.
    Uğur Aydın Z; Ocak MG; Bayrak S; Göller Bulut D; Orhan K
    Int Endod J; 2021 Feb; 54(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 32931021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of histogram equalization and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization effect on image quality and fractal dimensions of digital periapical radiographs.
    Mehdizadeh M; Tavakoli Tafti K; Soltani P
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):418-424. PubMed ID: 36076131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the mandibular trabecular bone in patients with bruxism using fractal analysis.
    Gulec M; Tassoker M; Ozcan S; Orhan K
    Oral Radiol; 2021 Jan; 37(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 31933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of different Apexification treatments of teeth with immature apices and apical periodontitis on the fractal dimensions of trabecular bone.
    Ince Yusufoglu S; Ugur Aydin Z; Tulumbaci F; Bayrak S
    Aust Endod J; 2021 Aug; 47(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 32902092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of change in trabecular bone structure surrounding dental implants by fractal dimension analysis and comparison with radiomorphometric indicators: a retrospective study.
    Karadag I; Yilmaz HG
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13145. PubMed ID: 35341061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in the fractal dimension, feret diameter, and lacunarity of mandibular alveolar bone during initial healing of dental implants.
    Önem E; Baksı BG; Sogur E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 23057012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image resolution and exposure time of digital radiographs affects fractal dimension of periapical bone.
    Baksi BG; Fidler A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Oct; 16(5):1507-10. PubMed ID: 22124611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image-based Bone Density Classification Using Fractal Dimensions and Histological Analysis of Implant Recipient Site.
    Hayek E; Aoun G; Geha H; Nasseh I
    Acta Inform Med; 2020 Dec; 28(4):272-277. PubMed ID: 33627929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.
    Baksi BG; Fidler A
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical variations of trabecular bone structure in intraoral radiographs using fractal and particles count analyses.
    Amer ME; Heo MS; Brooks SL; Benavides E
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2012 Mar; 42(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 22474642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison between the Implant Stability Quotient and the Fractal Dimension of Alveolar Bone at the Implant Site.
    Kulczyk T; Czajka-Jakubowska A; Przystańska A
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4357627. PubMed ID: 30410933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal dimension analysis of periapical reactive bone in response to root canal treatment.
    Yu YY; Chen H; Lin CH; Chen CM; Oviir T; Chen SK; Hollender L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 18835536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrospective fractal analyses of one-year follow-up data obtained after single-visit nonsurgical endodontic retreatment on periapical radiographs.
    Tosun S; Karataslioglu E; Tulgar MM; Derindag G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Nov; 25(11):6465-6472. PubMed ID: 34302217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.