104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3466130)
1. The effects of beam quality and optical density on image quality in dental radiography.
Price C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Nov; 62(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 3466130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 1: Subjective assessment and contrast.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Nov; 20(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 1808011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on image quality in dental radiography. 2. Objective assessment.
Price C; McDonnell D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 1397453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of kilovoltage and filtration on dental radiographic film sensitivity.
Price C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Mar; 53(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 6950348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of additional filtration on image quality in dental radiography: comparison of niobium with aluminium.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 1397460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of aluminum-yttrium filtration for intraoral radiography.
Farman AG; Perez C; Jacobson A; Kelly MS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Feb; 67(2):224-6. PubMed ID: 2919069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density.
Alexander JB; Andrews JD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image quality of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.
Peretz B
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jul; 24(3):96. PubMed ID: 17091627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The consistent image--how to improve the quality of dental radiographs: 1. Quality scale, operator technique, X-ray set.
Carmichael F
Dent Update; 2005 Dec; 32(10):611-3, 616. PubMed ID: 16379438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Compensation of differences in density of radiographs by densitometry.
Duinkerke AS; Van de Poel AC; Van der Linden FP; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Apr; 45(4):637-42. PubMed ID: 273854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequent, low-dose, improved-contrast radiographic images with the use of narrow x-ray beams.
Benn DK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Aug; 74(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 1508533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
Borg E
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Aspects of quality in intra- and extraoral radiographs].
Sonnabend E; Benz C
Zahnarztl Mitt; 1987 May; 77(9):954, 956-7. PubMed ID: 3475879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of photodensitometric with high-resolution digital analysis of bone density from serial dental radiographs.
Dubrez B; Jacot-Descombes A; Pun T; Cimasoni G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Feb; 21(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1397451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilize your dental X-ray set better.
Sewerin P
Int Dent J; 1987 Mar; 37(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 3473039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
