104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3466130)
21. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Grassl U; Schulze RK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Energy-selective filtration of dental x-ray beams.
Gelskey DE; Baker CG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Nov; 52(5):565-7. PubMed ID: 6946385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of thin K-edge filters on the image quality of D- and E-speed dental film.
MacDonald-Jankowski DS; Lawinski CP; Payne M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8593903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differences in aluminum equivalent values of endodontic sealers: conventional versus digital radiography.
Baksi BG; Sen BH; Eyuboglu TF
J Endod; 2008 Sep; 34(9):1101-4. PubMed ID: 18718374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the quality of radiographs accompanying biopsy specimens.
Rumberg H; Hollender L; Oda D
J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 127(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 8819783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. When will excellent radiographic images be available to the general dental office?
Lavelle CL; Wu CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 7835522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Salvaging dark dental radiographs.
Winstanley TD
Dent Update; 1996; 23(6):246, 249. PubMed ID: 9084254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
Versteeg KH; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Information gain at reduced exposure time using a prototype video-enhancement device.
Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Peterson MG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 2637875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer correction of projective distortions in dental radiographs.
Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Groenhuis RA
J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1032-6. PubMed ID: 6379007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of independent film and object rotation on projective geometric standardization of dental radiographs.
Fisher E; van der Stelt PF; Ostuni J; Dunn SM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 8593908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recognizing invariant geometric structure in dental radiographs.
Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Aug; 21(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 1397469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Diagnostic image quality and dose reduction using niobium filtration for cephalometric radiography.
Wakoh M; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):189-94. PubMed ID: 8181645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts.
Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The use of dental radiographs: update and recommendations.
American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs
J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 137(9):1304-12. PubMed ID: 16946440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
Brocklebank LM
Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics.
Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M; Zöger B
Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8362363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]