161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34662279)
1. Construction and Evaluation of Robust Interpretation Models for Breast Cancer Metastasis Prediction.
Adnan N; Zand M; Huang THM; Ruan J
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2022; 19(3):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 34662279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Opening the black box: interpretable machine learning for predictor finding of metabolic syndrome.
Zhang Y; Zhang X; Razbek J; Li D; Xia W; Bao L; Mao H; Daken M; Cao M
BMC Endocr Disord; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 36028865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer prediction with transcriptome profiling using feature selection and machine learning methods.
Taghizadeh E; Heydarheydari S; Saberi A; JafarpoorNesheli S; Rezaeijo SM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):410. PubMed ID: 36183055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Information bottleneck-based interpretable multitask network for breast cancer classification and segmentation.
Wang J; Zheng Y; Ma J; Li X; Wang C; Gee J; Wang H; Huang W
Med Image Anal; 2023 Jan; 83():102687. PubMed ID: 36436356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of prediction models for one-year brain tumour survival using machine learning: a comparison of accuracy and interpretability.
Charlton CE; Poon MTC; Brennan PM; Fleuriot JD
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 May; 233():107482. PubMed ID: 36947980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pseudo-class part prototype networks for interpretable breast cancer classification.
Choukali MA; Amirani MC; Valizadeh M; Abbasi A; Komeili M
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10341. PubMed ID: 38710757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Machine learning techniques for personalized breast cancer risk prediction: comparison with the BCRAT and BOADICEA models.
Ming C; Viassolo V; Probst-Hensch N; Chappuis PO; Dinov ID; Katapodi MC
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Jun; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 31221197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.
Dhahri H; Al Maghayreh E; Mahmood A; Elkilani W; Faisal Nagi M
J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():4253641. PubMed ID: 31814951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretable prediction of mortality in liver transplant recipients based on machine learning.
Zhang X; Gavaldà R; Baixeries J
Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt A):106188. PubMed ID: 36306583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feature Selection is Critical for 2-Year Prognosis in Advanced Stage High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer by Using Machine Learning.
Laios A; Katsenou A; Tan YS; Johnson R; Otify M; Kaufmann A; Munot S; Thangavelu A; Hutson R; Broadhead T; Theophilou G; Nugent D; De Jong D
Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211044678. PubMed ID: 34693730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of machine learning techniques for predicting survival in ovarian cancer.
Sorayaie Azar A; Babaei Rikan S; Naemi A; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi J; Pirnejad H; Bagherzadeh Mohasefi M; Wiil UK
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Dec; 22(1):345. PubMed ID: 36585641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the molecular subtype of breast cancer and identifying interpretable imaging features using machine learning algorithms.
Ma M; Liu R; Wen C; Xu W; Xu Z; Wang S; Wu J; Pan D; Zheng B; Qin G; Chen W
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1652-1662. PubMed ID: 34647174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing interpretability of automatically extracted machine learning features: application to a RBM-Random Forest system on brain lesion segmentation.
Pereira S; Meier R; McKinley R; Wiest R; Alves V; Silva CA; Reyes M
Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():228-244. PubMed ID: 29289703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMLI-ICC: an ensemble machine learning-based integration algorithm for metastasis prediction and risk stratification in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Ruan J; Xu S; Chen R; Qu W; Li Q; Ye C; Wu W; Jiang Q; Yan F; Shen E; Chu Q; Jia Y; Zhang X; Fu W; Chen J; Timko MP; Zhao P; Fan L; Shen Y
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Nov; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36259363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Image Classification Problems: Case Study on Glioma Cancer Prediction.
Pintelas E; Liaskos M; Livieris IE; Kotsiantis S; Pintelas P
J Imaging; 2020 May; 6(6):. PubMed ID: 34460583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. White box radial basis function classifiers with component selection for clinical prediction models.
Van Belle V; Lisboa P
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 24262978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Explaining decisions of graph convolutional neural networks: patient-specific molecular subnetworks responsible for metastasis prediction in breast cancer.
Chereda H; Bleckmann A; Menck K; Perera-Bel J; Stegmaier P; Auer F; Kramer F; Leha A; Beißbarth T
Genome Med; 2021 Mar; 13(1):42. PubMed ID: 33706810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An accurate and interpretable model for BCCT.core.
Oliveira HP; Magalhaes A; Cardoso MJ; Cardoso JS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():6158-61. PubMed ID: 21097148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
