These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34662710)

  • 1. Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 4 : The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019.
    Bai ZG; Bing Q; Gong RR; Bai RH; Zhou Y; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Jan; 141():132-140. PubMed ID: 34662710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
    Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.
    Cao L; Yao L; Hui X; Li J; Zhang X; Li M; Feng Z; Ren M; Xian K; Sun Y; Liu Y; Luo X; Chen Y; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 140():178-188. PubMed ID: 34418547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Qi GQ; Lin XT; Wang T; Chen ZM; Yang KH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 22924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of clinical systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric urology: can practices on contemporary highest levels of evidence be built?
    O'Kelly F; DeCotiis K; Aditya I; Braga LH; Koyle MA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Apr; 16(2):207-217. PubMed ID: 31917158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar.
    Tian J; Zhang J; Ge L; Yang K; Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():50-58. PubMed ID: 28063911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
    Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Guo J; Qi G; Li H; Peng J; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20185. PubMed ID: 21633698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of meta-analyses of observational studies published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang ZW; Cheng J; Liu Z; Ma JC; Li JL; Wang J; Yang KH
    BMJ Open; 2015 Dec; 5(12):e008066. PubMed ID: 26644119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping.
    Wang Y; Chen N; Guo K; Li Y; E F; Yang C; Shang X; Li X; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():1-12. PubMed ID: 36351510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
    Zheng Q; Lai F; Li B; Xu J; Long J; Peng S; Li Y; Liu Y; Xiao H
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():639652. PubMed ID: 34262914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PROTOCOL: Critical appraisal of methodological quality and reporting items of systematic reviews with meta-analysis in evidence-based social science in China: A systematic review.
    Guo L; Zhou W; Xing X; Wei Z; Yang M; Ma M; Yang K; White H
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2022 Dec; 18(4):e1278. PubMed ID: 36908832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
    Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.